Now that largefile is mandatory removes package dependencies and
conditionals.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This commit doesn't touch infra packages.
Signed-off-by: Jerzy Grzegorek <jerzy.grzegorek@trzebnica.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
[Thomas: fix minor typo in commit title.]
Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Since a while, the semantic of BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB has been changed
from "prefer static libraries when possible" to "use only static
libraries". The former semantic didn't make much sense, since the user
had absolutely no control/idea of which package would use static
libraries, and which packages would not. Therefore, for quite some
time, we have been starting to enforce that BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB
should really build everything with static libraries.
As a consequence, this patch renames BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB to
BR2_STATIC_LIBS, and adjust the Config.in option accordingly.
This also helps preparing the addition of other options to select
shared, shared+static or just static.
Note that we have verified that this commit can be reproduced by
simply doing a global rename of BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB to
BR2_STATIC_LIBS plus adding BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB to Config.in.legacy.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
The file containing the license for lua 5.1 was removed and the license
text was added to the readme in 5.2.
[Peter: swap 5.1/5.2 logic]
Signed-off-by: Frank Hunleth <fhunleth@troodon-software.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Package's options should be named after the package.
Lua is an interpreter, but the package is named 'lua'. So we want to
name the config option with '_LUA_', not with '_LUA_INTERPRETER_'
Besides, naming them with '_LUA_INTERPRETER_' might be confusing, since
there is a package named 'luainterpreter'.
Since the renamed options are part of a choice, we can't use the legacy
options to select the new ones. So we instead instruct the user to go
select the appropriate option in the choice.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Francois Perrad <fperrad@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
The basic rule for a package is to have its options named
after the package name. There is no reason this should not
also be the case for virtual packages.
Besides, this will allow us to switch luainterpreter to use the
soon-to-be-introduced virtual-package infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Eric Le Bihan <eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Zick <minimod@morethan.org>
Cc: Francois Perrad <fperrad@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
since the comeback of version in module path (see commit ccd68a51)
the upstream Makefiles are usable for install.
Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Useless since the uninstall commands were removed in eb7bd9ef
Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
This patch introduces the luainterpreter virtual package, which
is provided either by 'lua' or by 'lua-jit'.
Packages that require a Lua interpreter can then depend on
BR2_PACKAGE_LUAINTERPRETER (in their Config.in) and luainterpreter
(in their .mk).
Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: switch to package-defined providers,
apply Thomas' comments]
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
the static version of luac is enough
Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Tested-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
The Lua website says:
"Like most names, it should be written in lower case with an initial capital,
that is, "Lua". Please do not write it as "LUA", which is both ugly and
confusing, because then it becomes an acronym with different meanings for
different people."
http://www.lua.org/about.html
So, let's honor this request in buildroot.
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
This finally removes the BR2_HAVE_DEVFILES option, that was used to
install/keep development files on target. With the recent migration of
the internal backend to the package infrastructure, we had anyway lost
the ability to build gcc for the target, and install the uClibc
development files on the target.
[Peter: also remove support/scripts/copy.sh]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
(Possibly) fixes#5354
The lua shared library patch was creating the shared library with
-nostdlib -lgcc for some unknown reason, which most likely is
the reason for the link issue reported in #5354.
Fix it by dropping these arguments, so gcc gets to figure out itself
what dependencies are needed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Installation of host-lua was failing because it was the first package
to be built, and $(HOST_DIR)/usr/lib didn't exist. Therefore, use
install -D everywhere so that intermediate directories are created as
needed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
gcc 4.6 has become more sensitive about option ordering, especially
libraries. It requires the -l flags to be placed after the object
files that need that library. See for example
http://nick.zoic.org/art/etc/gcc-linker-libs.html. We had -llua at the
beginning of the link command line, causing build issues (here on gcc
4.6 with host-lua).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Commit ad6af5819f removed the
HOST_LUA_DEPENDENCIES assignement to the empty variable, so from that
commit, the dependencies of host-lua are automatically computed from
the dependencies of lua. Since lua can depend on readline and ncurses,
it means that host-lua can depend on host-readline and host-ncurses,
and the host-readline package does not exist in Buildroot. Since there
is no reason to build host-lua with readline/ncurses support, just
re-add the HOST_LUA_DEPENDENCIES variable.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Francois Perrad <fperrad@gmail.com>
Use a patch rather than sed'ing files in the build process.
Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <fperrad@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
[thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com: rewrote the patch, which was
corrupted in the original submission. Used quilt to refresh the Lua
patches, so that the version numbers are no longer present in the file
names]
Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
