f974a493f0
To ease the transition to having both OpenSSL and LibreSSL, there has to be a new virtual package introduced to handle both. Instead of making a libssl, and adding OpenSSL and libressl to that package, it will be far easier to move openssl to libopenssl and to make OpenSSL a virtual package. This offers a few advantages: - BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSL is still a visible symbol with no dependencies. - It does not require a huge patch to convert every instance of OpenSSL -> libssl) - Users will be able to update without ever having to select anything new. - LibreSSL can be added at a later date to the virtual package. Signed-off-by: Adam Duskett <Adamduskett@outlook.com> [Thomas: define BR2_PACKAGE_PROVIDES_HOST_OPENSSL to the value "host-libopenssl" as we always want to use the original OpenSSL for the host variant.] Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
0001-Dont-waste-time-building-manpages-if-we-re-not-going.patch | ||
0002-cryptodev-Fix-issue-with-signature-generation.patch | ||
libopenssl.hash | ||
libopenssl.mk |