kumquat-buildroot/package/binutils/2.35.2/0005-or1k-Avoid-R_OR1K_GOT16-overflow-failures-in-presenc.patch
Giulio Benetti 394c62b21b package/binutils: add upstream backported patches to support -mcmodel=large gcc option
Add upstream backported patches that allows using -mcmodel=large gcc option
that in order allows fixing build failure due to binutils bug 21464:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21464

Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
[Arnout: remove the PATCH M/N parts - cfr. check-package]
2021-05-21 10:36:04 +02:00

62 lines
2.0 KiB
Diff

From 097b83a1c9c694a14e6081cee034bf24f16875c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 06:02:16 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] or1k: Avoid R_OR1K_GOT16 overflow failures in presence of
R_OR1K_GOT_AHI16
Now that we support R_OR1K_GOT_AHI16 we can relax the R_OR1K_GOT16
overflow validation check if the section has R_OR1K_GOT_AHI16.
We cannot simple disable R_OR1K_GOT16 overflow validation as there will
still be binaries that will have only R_OR1K_GOT16. The
R_OR1K_GOT_AHI16 relocation will only be added by GCC when building with
the option -mcmodel=large.
This assumes that R_OR1K_GOT_AHI16 will come before R_OR1K_GOT16, which
is the code pattern that will be emitted by GCC.
bfd/ChangeLog:
PR 21464
* elf32-or1k.c (or1k_elf_relocate_section): Relax R_OR1K_GOT16
overflow check if we have R_OR1K_GOT_AHI16 followed by
R_OR1K_GOT16.
Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
---
bfd/elf32-or1k.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bfd/elf32-or1k.c b/bfd/elf32-or1k.c
index 8e395827123..9f315bfda99 100644
--- a/bfd/elf32-or1k.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-or1k.c
@@ -1280,6 +1280,7 @@ or1k_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
asection *sgot, *splt;
bfd_vma plt_base, got_base, got_sym_value;
bfd_boolean ret_val = TRUE;
+ bfd_boolean saw_gotha = FALSE;
if (htab == NULL)
return FALSE;
@@ -1487,6 +1488,16 @@ or1k_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
|| r_type == R_OR1K_GOT_AHI16)
relocation -= got_sym_value;
+ if (r_type == R_OR1K_GOT_AHI16)
+ saw_gotha = TRUE;
+
+ /* If we have a R_OR1K_GOT16 followed by a R_OR1K_GOT_AHI16
+ relocation we assume the code is doing the right thing to avoid
+ overflows. Here we mask the lower 16-bit of the relocation to
+ avoid overflow validation failures. */
+ if (r_type == R_OR1K_GOT16 && saw_gotha)
+ relocation &= 0xffff;
+
/* Addend should be zero. */
if (rel->r_addend != 0)
{
--
2.25.1