587eb69d97
The patch refers to [1] which says "Unfortuantely, arm-gcc defaults to generating code for armv5t." Since we always explicitly pass the target CPU for ARM, the default CPU shouldn't matter. As suggested by Arnout [2], a test based on qemu_arm_versatile_defconfig has been done without this patch and there is no regression. [1] https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2008-05/msg00009.html [2] http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2018-May/222104.html Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
0004-gcc-xtensa-fix-NAND-code-in-xtensa_expand_atomic.patch | ||
0005-gcc-xtensa-don-t-force-PIC-for-uclinux-target.patch |