0d887cc2b4
Currently, we define the so-called "overflow group" as 'nogroup'. However, one practical issue is that systemd-sysusers will otherwise create a 'nobody' group with gid 999, because that's is what is usual to define the overflow group: users and groups are defined in LSB (Linux Standard Base): https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/LSB_5.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/usernames.html Quoting: "If the username exists on a system,then they should be in the suggested corresponding group". Only Debian and derivatives depart from this custom, naming it 'nogroup' (hence the rationale for commit |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
dev | ||
etc | ||
media | ||
mnt | ||
opt | ||
proc | ||
root | ||
run | ||
sys | ||
tmp | ||
usr |