de4cf25375
Link to Rust 1.66.0 annoucement: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2022/12/15/Rust-1.66.0.html Newest version of the source archives have been retrieved with their hash values, and the signature of the .asc files have been verified as follows: $ curl -fsSL https://static.rust-lang.org/rust-key.gpg.ascii | gpg --import $ gpg --verify <filename.asc> <filename> There is no typographical error in the packages according to the check-pakage utility: $ ./utils/check-package package/rust-bin/* $ ./utils/check-package package/rust/* The testsuite tool were successfully run for rust and rust-bin packages to test the Rust toolchain under 1.66.0: $ ./support/testing/run-tests -k -d dl/ -o testsuite tests.package.test_rust.TestRustBin $ ./support/testing/run-tests -k -d dl/ -o testsuite tests.package.test_rust.TestRust In order to verify the compatibility of packages depending on Rust 1.66.0, tests using `./utils/test-pkg` were run. You may want to execute the test-pkg command after creating a `.config` file enabling the corresponding BR2_PACKAGE, for example: Create a file `buildroot/ripgrep.config` containing "BR2_PACKAGE_RIPGREP=y" Then execute: $ ./utils/test-pkg -d test-pkg -c ripgrep.config -p ripgrep Results: librsvg OK ripgrep OK suricata OK bat OK Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
rust-bin.hash | ||
rust-bin.mk |