Current, we only display the path that causes the paranoid failure. This
is sufficient, as we can fail only for -I and -L options, and it is thus
easy to infer from the path, which option is the culprit.
However, we're soon to add a new test for the -isystem option, and then
when a failure occurs, we would not know whether it was because of -I or
-isystem. Being able to differentiate both can be hugely useful to
track down the root cause for the unsafe path.
Add two new arguments to the check_unsafe_path() function: one with the
current-or-previous argument, one to specify whether it has the path in
it or not. Print that in the error message, instead of just the path.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
105a8c156c