From 947bf03ec3d9eaa0bfc0269eed86b9364e94bc1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 15:25:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] missing.h: drop clock_nanosleep() replacement Since uClibc-ng commits 68628fe7d463541bf3c33da6b214e63c0cc9feed ("librt: declare clock_nanosleep not only for NPTL") and ddbb03e77ac1a48740688814b82f45c97ee81f37 ("librt: clock_nanosleep could be even used without threads"), clock_nanosleep() is always provided by uClibc, regardless of the thread implementation (none, linuxthreads, nptl). These commits will be part of the upcoming 1.0.31 release of uClibc-ng. Thanks to this, we can drop the replacement clock_nanosleep() implementation added by linuxptp. Without this, linuxptp fails to build with: missing.h:117:19: error: static declaration of 'clock_nanosleep' follows non-static declaration static inline int clock_nanosleep(clockid_t clock_id, int flags, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from clockadj.h:24:0, from clockadj.c:24: Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni --- missing.h | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/missing.h b/missing.h index 2f7adb9..60f89a3 100644 --- a/missing.h +++ b/missing.h @@ -129,13 +129,6 @@ enum { #define TFD_TIMER_ABSTIME (1 << 0) -static inline int clock_nanosleep(clockid_t clock_id, int flags, - const struct timespec *request, - struct timespec *remain) -{ - return syscall(__NR_clock_nanosleep, clock_id, flags, request, remain); -} - static inline int timerfd_create(int clockid, int flags) { return syscall(__NR_timerfd_create, clockid, flags); -- 2.14.4