The hash files do not use trailing backslash \ to continue lines, so
we don't want them to be interpreted thusly, so we use 'read -r'
(SC2162).
The h_file is used twice in the same loop, once for reading from it,
and once just to print it, so there is no conflict (SC2094).
Integrer variables need not be quoted (SC2086). In any case, should
there be an actual issue and they be set empty, that would cause a
runtime issue, wether they be quoted or not.
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
(cherry picked from commit 9cb421c16f)
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Currently, we expect and only use hash files that lie within the package
directory, alongside the .mk file. Those hash files are thus bundled
with Buildroot.
This implies that only what's known to Buildroot can ever get into those
hash files. For packages where the version is fixed (or a static
choice), then we can carry hashes for those known versions.
However, we do have a few packages for which the version is a free-form
entry, where the user can provide a custom location and/or version. like
a custom VCS tree and revision, or a custom tarball URL. This means that
Buildroot has no way to be able to cary hashes for such custom versions.
This means that there is no integrity check that what was downloaded is
what was expected. For a sha1 in a git tree, this is a minor issue,
because the sha1 by itself is already a hash of the expected content.
But for custom tarballs URLs, or for a tag in a VCS, there is indeed no
integrity check.
Buildroot can't provide such hashes, but interested users may want to
provide those, and currently there is no (easy) way to do so.
So, we need our download helpers to be able to accept more than one hash
file to lookup for hashes.
Extend the dl-wrapper and the check-hash helpers thusly, and update the
legal-info accordingly.
Note that, to be able to pass more than one hash file, we also need to
re-order the arguments passed to support/download/check-hash, which also
impies some shuffling in the three places it is called:
- 2 in dl-wrapper
- 1 in the legal-info infra
That in turn also requires that the legal-license-file macro args get
re-ordered to have the hash file last; we take the opportunity to also
move the HOST/TARGET arg to be first, like in the other legal-info
macros.
Reported-by: "Martin Zeiser (mzeiser)" <mzeiser@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Commit 1ba85b7f87 (support/download: add explicit no-hash support)
introduced the 'none' hash type, in an attempt to make hash files
mandatory, but not failing on archives localy generated, like those
for git or svn repositories, especially for those packages where a
version choice was present, which would allow for either remote
archives for which we'd have a hash or VCS trees for which we could
not have a hash for the localy generated archive.
Indeed, back in the time, we did not have a mean to generate
reproducible archives, so having a hash file without a hash for
thosel ocally generated archives would trigger an error in the
hash-checking machinery.
But now, low-and-behold, we do know how to generate those archives,
and we have a mechanism to explicitly exclude some archives from being
hash-checked (e.g. when the version string itself can be user-provided).
As such, the 'none' hash type no longer has any raison d'être, we do not
use it in-tree, and its use in a br2-external tree is most probably
inexistent (as is the use of hash files alotgether most probably).
So we simply drop the support for that.
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
[Thomas: drop support in checkpackagelib, as reported by Ricardo.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Now that custom external toolchains to be downloaded properly instruct
to not fail on a missing hash, restore the mandatory hash check for
everything else.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Acked-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
In very constrained cases, it might be needed to not fail if a hash is
missing. This is notably the case for custom external toolchains to be
downloaded, because we do have a .hash file for external toolchains,
but we obviously can not have hashes for all existing custom toolchains
(he, "custom"!).
So, add a way to avoid failing in that case.
>From the Makefile, we export the list of files for which not to check
the hash. Then, from the check-hash script, if no check was done, and
the file we were trying to match in in this exclusion list, we just exit
without error.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Tested-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
changes v6 -> v7:
- /beautify/ the pattern in the case clause
Changed v5 -> v6: (Arnout)
- fix the pattern in the case clause
Changes v4 -> v5:
- micro-optimisation, use case-esac instead of a for-loop (Arnout)
- typoes (Arnout)
Changes v3 -> v4:
- drop the magic value, use a list of excluded files (Arnout)
Changes v1 -> v2:
- fix typoes in commit log
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Tested-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
[Thomas: fix issues noticed by Arnout:
- Rewrap the linux/Config.in paragraph
- Revert the "is a toolchain dependency" -> "has a toolchain
dependency" change from pkg-generic.mk, as the original was
correct.]
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
When downloading from a repository, we explicitly pass no hash file,
because we can't check hashes in that case.
However, we're still printing a message that there is a missign hash
file.
Beside being a bit annoying (since we can't do anything about it), it
may also be wrong, especially for packages for which we support multiple
versions, with some being downloaded via a git clone and others as
tarballs.
Just print no warning when the path to the hash file is empty.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
When the user selects a custom toolchain to be downloaded, there's no
hash for that toolchain, so the download fails, now that hashes are
mandatory.
Fix that by simply exiting as if there was no error, until we have a
better fix...
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Instead of silently accepting a missing .hash file, print a warning.
This can be grepped from a build log, to find packages that still have
no hash, with the long-term goal of adding hashes for all packages.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
At the time we introduced hashes, we did not want to be too harsh in the
beginning, and give people some time to adapt and accept the hashes. So
we so far only whined^Wwarned about a missing hash (when the .hash file
exists).
Some time has passed now, and people are still missing updating hashes
when bumping packages.
Let's make that warning a little bit more annoying...
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Return different exit codes depending on the error that occured:
0: no error (hash file missing, or all hashes match)
1: unknown option
2: hash file exists, but at least one hash in error
3: hash file exists, but no hash for file to check
4: hash file exists, but at least one hash type unknown
This will be used in a later patch to decide whether the downloaded file
should be kept or removed.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Add support to explicitly state that an archive has no hash.
This can be used for archives downloaded from a repository, like a
git-clone or a subversion checkout, or using the github helper.
This will come in handy when we'll eventually make hashes mandatory as
soon as a .hash file exists: for some packages, like gcc, some versions
are downloaded as archives from upstream, while other versions may come
from a GitHub repository (via the github herlper).
In this case, a .hash file would exist, that contains hashes for the
downloaded tarballs, but archives downloaded from the repository would
not have a hash (since it is currently not possible to have reproducible
such archives). So, we'd need a way to explicitly state there is no
hash, on purpose, for those archives.
So, add 'none' as a new type of hash.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Currently, specifying a hash file for our download wrapper is mandatory.
However, when we download a git, svn, bzr, hg or cvs tree, there's by
design no hash to check the download against.
Since we're going to have hash checking mandatory when a hash file
exists, this would break those downloads from a repository.
So, make specifying a hash file optional when calling our download
wrapper and bail out early from the check-hash script if no hash file is
specified.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Add an option flag to all backends, as well as the check-hash script, so
as to silence download helpers when the user wants a silent build.
Additionaly, make the default be verbose.
Inspired by Fabio's patch on git/svn.
[Thomas: fix a typo "Environemnt" -> "Environment"
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Instead of repeating the check in our download rules, delegate the check
of the hashes to the download wrapper.
This needs three different changes:
- add a new argument to the download wrapper, that is the full path to
the hash file; if the hash file does not exist, that does not change
the current behaviour, as the existence of the hash file is checked
for in the check-hash script;
- add a third argument to the check-hash script, to be the basename of
the file to check; this is required because we no longer check the
final file with the final filename, but an intermediate file with a
temporary filename;
- do the actual call to the check-hash script from within the download
wrapper.
This further paves the way to doing pre-download checks of the hashes
for the locally cached files.
Note: this patch removes the check for hashes for already downloaded
files, since the wrapper script exits early. The behaviour to check
localy cached files will be restored and enhanced in the following
patch.
[Thomas: fix minor typo in comment.]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Cc: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
The argument are correctly used, but incorrectly documented.
Inverse the comments to match the actual usage.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Not all systems have /bin/bash (e.g. NixOS[1] doesn't). Buildroot
already uses /usr/bin/env shebangs for other interpreters (perl,
python), so why not bash?
This changes only the shebangs used by Buildroot itself; stuff installed
to the target system is left unchanged.
With this applied I can run Buildroot unmodified on NixOS.
[1]: http://nixos.org/
Signed-off-by: Bjørn Forsman <bjorn.forsman@gmail.com>
Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Although md5 is, for legacy reasons, a supported hash type,
it is not documented on purpose, since it is now known to
be weak.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Some of the packages that Buildroot might build are sensitive packages,
related to security: openssl, dropbear, ca-certificates...
Some of those packages are downloaded over plain http, because there is
no way to get them over a secure channel, such as https.
In these dark times of pervasive surveillance, the potential for harm that
a tampered-with package could generate, we may want to check the integrity
of those sensitive packages.
So, each package may now provide a list of hashes for all files that needs
to be downloaded, and Buildroot will just fail if any downloaded file does
not match its known hash, in which case it is removed.
Hashes can be any of the md5, sha1 or sha2 variants, and will be checked
even if the file was pre-downloaded.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
