skeleton-custom does not install the required /bin, /lib and /sbin
directories (or symlinks), which may result in an imcomplete tree, The
user could add the required directories/symlinks to the skeleton but
they may be invalid, depending on the state of BR2_ROOTFS_MERGED_USR.
Steps to reproduce:
- Enable BR2_ROOTFS_MERGED_USR and BR2_INIT_SYSTEMD
- Set BR2_ROOTFS_SKELETON_CUSTOM_PATH to "system/skeleton"
- Run "make skeleton"
- target/{bin.lib,sbin} will not exist
Add calls to SYSTEM_USR_SYMLINKS_OR_DIRS to INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS and
INSTALL_STAGING_CMDS, so the required directories or symlinks are
created.
Add a paragraph to the documentation clarifying that custom skeletons
don't need to contain /bin, /lib or /sbin and must not contain them when
BR2_ROOTFS_MERGED_USR is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
We now require python 2.7+, so update prerequisite.txt to match.
Signed-off-by: Adam Duskett <Aduskett@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
This commit updates package-make-target.txt with a few additional
useful per-package targets that have been added in recent times.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Currently, our commit titles are not very well standardized, and it
would be great to standardize them a little bit more. A number of
people use "<pkg>: " as prefix, others use "package/<pkg>: ". Some
people start the rest of the commit title (after the prefix) with an
upper-case letter, some with a lower-case letter.
In an attempt to standardize this, this commit updates the manual with
some examples of good commit titles.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.com.br>
Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
The script is utils/get-developers but the manual refers to get-developer in
several places.
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
This addon allows to generate a Buildroot package from a Luarocks
package definition.
Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Some packages may want to build only specific targets, instead of the
default.
So, allow them to provide FOO_NINJA_OPTS (not really options, but we
just mimicked the naming we already have for autotools packages).
Update the manual accordingly.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Eric Le Bihan <eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr>
Cc: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
external.desc must be present when using a br2-external tree. The
documentation notes this later in the text, but the file is missing
from the initial overview of files.
Fixes bug #11481.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Wagner <mail@philipp-wagner.com>
Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This variable is needed for upgrading packages with scancpan.
Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Explain how this can be used with git send-email, and how git can be
configured to use it automatically.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
As discussed in [1], our guideline for the ordering of 'depends on'
lines is not written down. Fix that.
[1] http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2018-October/232413.html
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Some users of kconfig need some packages to be built before their
kconfig infra be used.
For example, the linux kernel, starting with 4.16, needs flex and bison
to generate the parser code. Furthermore, starting with 4.18, it will
also need the cross-compiler before parsing the kconfig stuff, because
that calls the compiler to check its features.
Currently, this is broken, even the flex/bison ones, even though they
are listed, because there is no way to define dependencie that are
guaranteed before the (visual) configurators. For example:
$ make distclean
$ make menuconfig
--> enable the linux kernel, choose a defconfig, save, exit
$ make linux-menuconfig
[...]
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
YACC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c
/bin/sh: bison: command not found
LEX scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.c
scripts/Makefile.lib:196: recipe for target 'scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c' failed
make[3]: *** [scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c] Error 127
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
/bin/sh: flex: command not found
scripts/Makefile.lib:188: recipe for target 'scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.c' failed
make[3]: *** [scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.c] Error 127
Makefile:528: recipe for target 'rpc_defconfig' failed
make[2]: *** [rpc_defconfig] Error 2
linux/linux.mk:511: recipe for target '/home/ymorin/dev/buildroot/buildroot/output/build/linux-4.17.11/.config' failed
make[1]: *** [/home/ymorin/dev/buildroot/buildroot/output/build/linux-4.17.11/.config] Error 2
Makefile:79: recipe for target '_all' failed
make: *** [_all] Error 2
So, we introduce a new type of dependencies for kconfig-based packages,
that are guaranteed to be built and installed before the (visual)
configurators are called.
Since those dependencies are phony targets and therefore always out of
date, a normal dependency would cause the .config target to be rebuilt
on each invocation of make. So we use an order-only pre-requisite, like
is done for the patch dependency.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
Tested-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Currently, the wording in the manual instructs the user to generate a
tarball from "the contents of the +output/host+ directory".
This is pretty confusing, because taken literally, this would amount to
running a command like:
tar cf my-sdk.tar -C output/host/ .
This creates a tarbomb [0], which is very bad practice, because when
extracted, it creates multiple files in the current directory.
What one really wants to do, is create a tarball of the host/ directory,
with something like:
tar cf my-sdk.tar -C output host/
However, this is not much better, because the top-most directory would
have a very common name, host/, which is pretty easy to get conflict
with when it gets extracted.
So, we fix that mess by giving the top-most directory a recognisable
name, based on the target tuple, which we also use as the name of the
archive (suffixed with the usual +.tar.gz+.) We offer the user the
possibility to override that default by specifying the +BR2_SDK_PREFIX+
variable on the command line.
Since this is an output file, we place it in the images/ directory.
As some users expressed a very strong feeling that they do not want to
generate a tarball at all, and that doing so would badly hurt their
workflows [1], we actually prepare the SDK as was previously done, but
under the new, intermediate rule 'prepare-sdk'. The existing 'sdk' rule
obviously depend on that before generating the tarball.
We choose to make the existing rule to generate the tarball, and
introduce a new rule to just prepare the SDK, rather than keep the
existing rule as-is and introduce a new one to generate the tarball,
because it makes sense to have the simplest rule do the correct thing,
leaving advanced, power users use the longest command. If someone
already had a wrapper that called 'sdk' and expected just the host
directory to be prepared, then this is not broken; it just takes a bit
longer (gzip is pretty fast).
Update the manual accordingly.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_(computing)#Tarbomb
[1] http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2018-June/thread.html#223377
and some messages in the ensuing thread...
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Stefan Becker <chemobejk@gmail.com>
Cc: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@impinj.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <<a href="mailto:yann.morin.1998@free.fr" target="_blank">yann.morin.1998@free.fr</a>><br>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Becker <chemobejk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <<a href="mailto:yann.morin.1998@free.fr" target="_blank">yann.morin.1998@free.fr</a>><br>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
The oldest gcc that is known to work with current Buildroot is that of
RHEL 6, version 4.4.
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
scancpan is now in utils not in supports/scripts
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
The manual is GPL-2, and points to the COPYING file in the repository.
When we do a rendering of the manual for a specific version, that URL
is currently always poitning to the latest version of the COPYING file.
If we ever have to change the content of that file (e.g. to add a new
exception, more clarifications, a license change, or whatever), then
an old manual would point to that newer version, which would then be
incorrect.
Include the sha1 of the commit in the URL, so that the manual always
point to the tree at the time the manual was rendered, not the time
it is consulted. Contrary to the informative text above, use the full
sha1, not the shortened one.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Update documentation about adding meson-based packages with instructions for
using pkg-meson infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Eric Le Bihan <eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
For various reasons, we've always suggested users to avoid using a
branch as version string for their packages, because it does not work
as a they would expect:
- it is not reproducible, because the branch may change between two
builds that are done at different times;
- it does not even follow the branch, as Buildroot anyway generates
a local tarball, which it will reuse on subsequent builds.
Furthermore, since we fetch and not pull, any existing local branch
is not updated.
Yet, until recently, using a branch name would just work (with the
above limitations): the git tree was cloned, the branch checked out,
and the tarball created.
But with the advent of the git caching, using a branch name does not
work anymore. Indeed, we now do a git-fetch, and that does not create
a local master branch. So we can't check out master, because it does
not exist locally. And for other branches, as noticed above, the local
branch does not get udpated to the remote one.
Furthermore, the local branches are only created by chance, again as a
side-effect of trying to fetch the "special refs".
So, we can't say that we reliably support the use of a branch name.
Update the manual to state that using a branch does not work. Remove
the 'stable' example, as it looked like the name of a stable branch;
instead, replace it with a version string that ressemble a tag.
Fix the layout of the manual by making the version examples an actual
bulleted list.
Note: the above is only entirely true for git. For Mercurial, CVS and
subversion, the status may be mixed, but nonetheless, using branches is
still a bad idea, if at least because it is not reproducible, and
because Buildroot does not even follow the branch. So, we do not
differentiate between the various SCMs, and just flatly state that using
a branch name is not supported.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Maxime Hadjinlian <maxime.hadjinlian@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Update the documentation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr: slight rephrasing in error message, update manual]
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Hadjinlian <maxime.hadjinlian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
And add two references to it: in "Submitting patches" and in "Adding new
packages to Buildroot" sections.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martincoski <ricardo.martincoski@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@nokia.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
The graph-depends was not very consistent in colors vs. colours: some
parts were using colours, some parts were using colors.
Let's settle on the US spelling, colors.
This change the user-visble option --colours to --colors, but it is
unlikely that a lot of users customize the colors through
BR2_GRAPH_DEPS_OPTS, so this user interface change is considered
reasonable.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
This allows using <PKG>_SRCDIR_OVERRIDE_RSYNC_EXCLUSIONS in local.mk to
skip copying parts of source trees unneeded for building. For example,
when developing WebKitGTK+, it's handy to skip copying all the tests and
other build directories, which are huge:
WEBKITGTK_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR = /home/aperez/WebKit
WEBKITGTK_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR_RSYNC_EXCLUSIONS = \
--exclude JSTests --exclude ManualTests \
--exclude PerformanceTests --exclude WebDriverTests \
--exclude WebKitBuild --exclude WebKitLibraries \
--exclude WebKit.xcworkspace --exclude Websites \
--exclude Examples
This saves a good chunk of time when rsync is used for the first time to
copy the source tree over before building.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Perez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>
[Arnout: move documentation to the end of the section]
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
So far, we were using the 'go install' mechanism to build a package
and have its binary installed in
$$($(2)_WORKSPACE)/bin/linux_$$(GO_GOARCH). This worked fine when
building on x86-64 for ARM, but failed when building on x86-64 for
x86-64 because the binaries were installed in $$($(2)_WORKSPACE)/bin/.
Instead of doing some complicated logic to guess whether Go is going
to put our binaries in $$($(2)_WORKSPACE)/bin/ or in
$$($(2)_WORKSPACE)/bin/linux_$$(GO_GOARCH), we revert back to using
"go build", as it was done before the introduction of the golang
package infrastructure. "go build" lets us pass explicitly the
destination path of the binary to be generated.
There's just one complexity with how to decide on the name of the
binary that should be produced, and we have two cases:
- <pkg>_BUILD_TARGETS is the default, i.e ".". In this case we assume
a single binary is produced by "go build", and we name if after the
lower case package name. We allow this to be overridden thanks to
<pkg>_BIN_NAME.
- <pkg>_BUILD_TARGETS is non-default, and typically contains
something like "foo bar" or "cmd/foo cmd/bar". In this case, we
assume the binaries to be produced are "foo" and "bar", i.e we take
the non-directory part of the build target to name the binaries.
Because we're using this -o option, we no longer need to explicitly
create the binary directory, it is done by "go build".
Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/1f9cd7c48e8c8f41326632a9c0de83915d72c45b/
[Peter: use $(or instead of $(if as suggested by Arnout]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
toolchain-common.in is a Config.in file with an uncommon name.
It is just included by toolchain/Config.in, and toolchain/Config.in is
not that long, so instead of renaming the file, merge it to
toolchain/Config.in.
Move the raw contents from the file to the exact location it is
currently included in order to not change the order in the menu.
Update the references in the manual as well.
Suggested-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martincoski <ricardo.martincoski@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This patch adds the documentation for the golang infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Tested-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Extract dependencies are dependencies that must be ready before the
extract step of a package, i.e for tools that are needed to extract
packages themselves. Current examples of such tools are host-tar,
host-lzip and host-xz.
They are currently handled through DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ. However,
this mechanism has a number of drawbacks:
- First and foremost, because host-tar/host-lzip/host-xz are not
listed in the dependencies of packages, the package infrastructure
does not know it should rsync them in the context of per-package
SDK.
- Second, there is no dependency handling *between* them. I.e, we
have no mechanism that says host-tar should be built before
host-lzip, while it is in fact the case: if you need to build
host-lzip, you need to extract a tarball, so you may need host-tar
if your system tarball is not capable enough.
For those reasons, it makes sense to add explicit support for "extract
dependencies" in the package infrastructure, through the
<pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES variable. It is unlikely this variable will
ever be used by a package .mk file, but it will be used internally by
the package infrastructure.
[Peter: fix typo in manual]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Tested-by: Matt Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Ninja understands the `-j` option which defines how many jobs are
run in parallel.
Signed-off-by: Jörg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
When using a merged /usr, the kernel module path is really
/usr/lib/modules, as /lib is a symlink to usr/lib .
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Some packages (mostly, out-of-tree) may want to install binary blobs for
another architecture, outside the locations we currently exclude, like
in /opt or whatever...
Add support in check-bin-arch to accept any arbitrary location, that
individual package can each request to excude from the check, when they
are installed.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
utils/check-package complains as follows:
package/rustc/rustc.mk:10: possible typo: RUST_TARGET_NAME -> *RUSTC*
package/rustc/rustc.mk:18: possible typo: RUST_HOST_NAME -> *RUSTC*
As RUST_{HOST,TARGET}_NAME are related to the Rust compiler, it
sounds sensible to rename them to RUSTC_{HOST,TARGET}_NAME.
So update all rust related packages to use the new variables.
Signed-off-by: Eric Le Bihan <eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Add instructions for adding a package which uses Cargo as build system.
[Peter: fix indentation]
Signed-off-by: Eric Le Bihan <eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Add instructions for adding a package which uses the Meson build system.
Signed-off-by: Jörg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
Signed-off-by: Eric Le Bihan <eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr>
Reviewed-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This reverts commit 1e5a8916b2.
The idea was that the version string can be derived because we know the
package name.
However, this patch does not account for the fact that $(pkgname) always
points to the latest pacakge scanned, which in all other situation we're
using it, is the current package, because it is used inside one ot he
xxx-inner macros that are $(eval)ualed. So $(pkgname) is evaluated
"early" and gets the expected value.
However, the github value is not in one of those macros, so it gets
evaluated "late", when doing the actual download. So, by that time,
$(pkgname) will expand to the last package scanned, which is actuall the
manual (without a br2-external tree).
That would require that the _SITE variable be assigned with the :=
assignment operator. This is weird, because that would make it the only
variable to require that, but only when using the github helper, which
is even less obvious and would cause a lot of trouble...
The obvious fixup would seem to be to use $(PKG) instead, because that
already contains the upper-case package name that vcan be used as a
prefix to variables.
However, that does not work either, because we have a check that forbids
a trsailing slash in _SITE, check that is done in pacakge/pkg-generic,
inside the xxx-inner macro, during the $(eval) call.
And at that time, PKG is not yet defined, because it is only defined for
an actual recipe.
So we can't seem to have a workable solution. So, just revert the patch.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reiterate once more that <packagename>_PATCH variable can point
to an arbitrary URL, not just to a path relative to <packagename>_SITE.
While we're at it, also explain that the patch should be added to the
.hash file.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Mukhin <alexander.i.mukhin@gmail.com>
[Arnout: add sentence about .hash file.]
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
