Add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORTS_ALWAYS_LOCKFREE_ATOMIC_INTS variable and
use it in BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_64735.
This new variable will be used to select boost atomic when lock-free
atomic ints are not available
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
In order to add gcc 8 support for internal and external toolchain in
follow-up commits, introduce BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_8 symbol.
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Commit b9882925a4 (toolchain: introduce
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SHADOW_PASSWORDS) added this symbol to identify
Blackfin toolchains without shadow passwords support. We no longer
support Blackfin.
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@nokia.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
... to follow the convention: type, default, depends on, select, help.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martincoski <ricardo.martincoski@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
toolchain-common.in is a Config.in file with an uncommon name.
It is just included by toolchain/Config.in, and toolchain/Config.in is
not that long, so instead of renaming the file, merge it to
toolchain/Config.in.
Move the raw contents from the file to the exact location it is
currently included in order to not change the order in the menu.
Update the references in the manual as well.
Suggested-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martincoski <ricardo.martincoski@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Some cores are not supported by upstream gcc.
Use the newly-introduced symbol to state so, rather than have the
exclusion in the toolchain choice.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Some cores are not supported by upstream gcc.
Use the newly-introduced symbol to state so, rather than have the
exclusion in the toolchain choice.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Upstream gcc does not have support for C-Sky, and we do not have a
vendor tree for it either (yet?).
Use the newly-introduced symbol to state so, rather than have the
exclusion in the toolchain choice.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Some architectures or specific cores do not have support in upstream
gcc. Currently, they are individually listed as exclusions in the
toolchain choice.
This poses a maintainance burden, as the knowledge about what gcc
version supports what architecture is split across many places: the
toolchain choice, the gcc version choice, the external toolchains.
As a first step, add a blind option that architectures or individual
cores may select to indicate they lack support in our internal backend.
Actual use of the option will come in followup patches.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Commit 1b974425 (MIPS: add support for M6201 cores) explained that the
new core was not supported by upstream gcc, and as of gcc-8-trunk
that's still the case.
Ditto for 3cfbeb83 (MIPS: add support for P6600 cores).
This means that we currently allow to build an internal tolchain for
those cores, yet we have no suitable gcc version.
Disable the internal backend in this case.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This new boolean is true if the toolchain provides a built-in
full-featured implementation of gettext (glibc), and false if only a
stub implementation is provided (uclibc, musl).
This will be used in follow-up commits to decide whether libintl needs
to be built by gettext or not.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This commit provides basic support for the C-SKY architecture.
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
[Thomas: minor tweaks.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
The default Blackfin processor in Buildroot isn't supported by
gcc 6.1.0, so use bf532 as default. Disable any bf6xx processors
for internal toolchain users.
Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
As described at:
4520524ba0
this commit continues a series of updates of ARC tools.
This time we're updating tools to arc-2016.09-eng007 tag plus a
couple of fixes on top of it that will all make its way in the
next engineering build.
We hope this patch will cure most buildroot ARC failures as it
contains important fixes:
1) PIE fix. We have added PIE support to ARC toolchain at last.
So that should prevent breakage of many packages. As ARC now
supports PIE we remove ARC from BR2_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORTS_PIE
exclusion in toolchain/Config.in file.
2) Assembler fix. This patch also have changes that fixes frequent
assembler failures, e.g.:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/543/5430b902d900943a34c1888e7e410bd5df367bc2//
We still keep GDB as it is of arc-2016.03 release because there're some
issues we'd like to resolve before releasing it to wider audience.
So again note this is next engineering builds of arc-2016.09 series
and it might have all kinds of breakages, please don't use it for
production builds.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Zakharov <vzakhar@synopsys.com>
[Thomas: remove uClibc PIE patch, since we have bumped uClibc in the
mean time, to a version that contains the PIE fix for ARC.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
uClibc-ng does not support PIE for some architectures as
arc and m68k. It isn't implemented in the static linking case, too.
With musl toolchains you might have static PIE support with little
patching of gcc. Static linking for GNU libc isn't enabled in
buildroot. Fixup any package using special treatment of PIE.
(grep -ir pie package/*/*.mk)
Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
[Thomas: use positive logic.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
With gcc 6.1.0 and binutils 2.26 internal bfin toolchain can be used. A
gcc patch is required, which was reported upstream.
Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Don't enable SSP support on external toolchains just because they use
glibc or musl. Instead of that, make the external toolchains explictily
declare if they support SSP or not. And also add a check to detect SSP
support when using custom external toolchains.
For internal toolchains we always enable SSP support for glibc and musl.
Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ac7c9b3ad2e52abfe6b79a80045e4218eeb87175/
Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
[Thomas:
- remove uClibc-specific SSP check, since there is now a generic
check being done.
- send potential compilation errors caused by the SSP check to
oblivion, in order to avoid causing confusion for the user.
- add autobuilder reference.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Make sure BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_MUSL selects BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SSP since
musl always provides SSP support (like glibc).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Remove BR2_INET_IPV6 select for predefined external toolchains.
Remove the (non)IPv6 option prompt since it's now mandatory.
And force the toolchain check now that internal uclibc is always built
with IPv6 support and external non-IPv6 toolchains are disallowed.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
There's no need for toolchains or the user to declare largefile support
since it's now mandatory.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
The internal toolchain was a "best effort" approach - we strived to make
it build properly and all but it's mostly untested.
Since it's got issues disable it until it's properly fixed and tested
and leave the official ADI toolchain instead.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
For now we can only support glibc.
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Enable the internal toolchain backend for aarch64.
Tested with arm_foundationv8_defconfig and ARMs foundation v8 emulator.
Both glibc & eglibc work.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
The usual way to enable a package using the package infrastructure is to
use a config option so instead to add the toolchain package to the
TARGETS variable in the Makefile add a config option like all the other
toolchain packages.
[Thomas: remove comment that no longer made sense in the main
Makefile, and add a comment above the new hidden Config.in option to
explain what it is useful for.]
Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
As our architecture support expands to a number of architectures that
do not implement NPTL threading, and the number of packages that
depend on NPTL specific features, it has become necessary to be able
to know whether the toolchain has NPTL support or not.
This commit adds a new BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_NPTL hidden Config.in
option that allows packages to know whether NPTL is available or not.
This hidden option is:
* Automatically enabled when glibc/eglibc or musl toolchains are
used, either internal or external.
* Automatically enabled when an internal uClibc toolchain with NPTL
support is configured. It is left disabled otherwise for internal
uClibc toolchains.
* Configured according to a visible Config.in option for custom
external uClibc toolchains.
[Peter: factor _EXTERNAL_HAS_THREADS in single if as suggested by Arnout]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
This commit allows to build an internal toolchain for the Microblaze
architecture, with either glibc or eglibc.
Note that we add an explicit list of architectures that are supported
by uClibc, and Microblaze is not part of them, because it currently
doesn't build for this architecture.
[Thomas: add better commit log, add architecture dependencies on
uClibc, to avoid selecting uClibc on Microblaze]
Signed-off-by: Spenser Gilliland <spenser@gillilanding.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
This commit adds support for external toolchains based on the musl C
library, as available from http://www.musl-libc.org.
Note that the pre-built musl toolchains available from
http://musl.codu.org/ are not working for the moment, since they lack
sysroot support. However, this problem has been reported to the
maintainer, who has already added sysroot support in his scripts at
https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross, and therefore the next
version of the pre-built toolchains should work with Buildroot
out-of-the-box. In the mean time, the musl-cross script must be used
to build the toolchain.
[Peter: reword comment]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
In order to avoid the work of converting the toolchain-crosstool-ng
logic to the package infrastructure, we remove it from Buildroot,
since it has been deprecated since quite some time.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
While the idea of skipping the intermediate gcc step seems to work
fine in most situations, it causes problems with the SSP
support. Until we can figure out a proper solution for this problem,
we need to revert back to the previous solution of a three stages
build.
This reverts commit 2babed4a50.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
The only remaining thing in toolchain-buildroot/Config.in.2 is the
inclusion of the elf2flt option. It doesn't really make sense to have
a separate Config.in file for that, so let's move this to
toolchain-buildroot/Config.in.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
This commit refactors how Stack Smashing Protection support is handled
in Buildroot:
*) It turns the BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_USE_SSP option into an option
that only enables the SSP support in uClibc, when using the internal
toolchain backend.
*) It adds an hidden BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SSP option that gets enabled
when the toolchain has SSP support. Here we have the usual dance:
glibc/eglibc in internal/external backend always select this
option, in the case of uClibc/internal, it gets selected when
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_USE_SSP is enabled, in the case of
uClibc/external, there is a new configuration option that the user
must select (or not) depending on whether the toolchain has SSP
support.
*) It adds a new options BR2_ENABLE_SSP in the "Build options" menu,
to enable the usage of SSP support, by adding
-fstack-protector-all to the CFLAGS.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
When NPTL support was introduced, gcc required a three stages build
process. Since gcc 4.7, this is no longer necessary, and it is
possible to get back to a two stages build process. This patch takes
advantage of this, by doing a two stages build process when possible.
We introduce a few hidden kconfig options:
* BR2_GCC_VERSION_NEEDS_THREE_STAGE_BUILD, which is set by the gcc
Config.in logic to indicate that the compiler might need a three
stages build. Currently, all versions prior to 4.7.x are selecting
this kconfig option.
* BR2_TOOLCHAIN_LIBC_NEEDS_THREE_STAGE_BUILD, which indicates whether
the C library might need a three stages build. This is the case for
eglibc, and uClibc when NPTL is enabled.
* BR2_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_THREE_STAGE_BUILD finally is enabled when both
of the previous options are enabled. It indicates that a three
stages build is actually needed.
In addition to those options, the uClibc/gcc build logic is changed to
use only a two stages build process when possible.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
This commit adds very basic support to build for the Nios II
architecture. Toolchain support is still missing and instead
we need to use an external custom toolchain.
Notice that this architecture had been previously removed in
Buildroot 2010.05-rc1 release (as explained in the CHANGES file)
and this commit adds it back.
Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Using the newly introduced 'eglibc' package, this commit enables the
option of building a toolchain using the eglibc C library in the
Buildroot toolchain backend.
In details, this commit:
* Creates a choice to select uClibc or eglibc in the Buildroot
toolchain backend (in toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in), and
removes the fact that the Buildroot toolchain backend forcefully
enables uClibc (toolchain/Config.in).
* Creates a BUILDROOT_LIBC variables, which points to the package
implementing the C library (i.e either 'uclibc' or 'eglibc').
* Modifies the gcc-final and gcc-intermediate makefiles to use the
BUILDROOT_LIBC variable instead of hardcoding the use of uclibc.
* Ensures that TLS support is always enabled when building eglibc.
[Peter: fix commit text to refer to BUILDROOT_LIBC]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Currently, when we need to do a conditional on the type of C library
used, we need to take into account the three toolchain backends. As we
are going to add eglibc support to the Buildroot toolchain backend, it
would become even uglier, so this patch introduces two new hidden
options: BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC and BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC, that
exist regardless of the toolchain backend. The entire Buildroot code
base is converted to use those options.
Note that we have intentionally created only one option
(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC) for both glibc and eglibc, since they are
essentially the same, as far as Buildroot is concerned.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
For the following reasons:
- it used to be broken without anyone noticing for a long time,
- it is still not fully integrated within the Buildroot set of options,
- it has not gained much traction (not even I use it),
- I've always argued that sustained development should use an external
toolchain, and not rely on building one with Buildroot,
- I did not submit any of the enhancements requested during the last
developpers' day in Brussels,
- I have neither the incentive nor the time to maintain and enhance it,
it is time to deprecate the crosstool-NG backend for the 2013.05 release.
Then, it will be entirely removed early in the 2013.08 cycle, to let some
time for those that rely on it to voice their opinions. ;-)
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
