Also separate the fields in the hash file by two spaces.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado <sergio.prado@e-labworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
On Github, a large number of projects name their tag vXYZ (i.e v3.0,
v0.1, etc.). In some packages we do:
<pkg>_VERSION = v0.3
<pkg>_SITE = $(call github foo,bar,$(<pkg>_VERSION))
And in some other packages we do:
<pkg>_VERSION = 0.3
<pkg>_SITE = $(call github foo,bar,v$(<pkg>_VERSION))
I.e in one case we consider the version to be v0.3, in the other case
we consider 0.3 to be the version.
The problem with v0.3 is that when used in conjunction with
release-monitoring.org, it doesn't work very well, because
release-monitoring.org has the concept of "version prefix" and using
that they drop the "v" prefix for the version.
Therefore, a number of packages in Buildroot have a version that
doesn't match with release-monitoring.org because Buildroot has 'v0.3'
and release-monitoring.org has '0.3'.
Since really the version number of 0.3, is makes sense to update our
packages to drop this 'v'.
This commit only addresses the (common) case of github packages where
the prefix is simply 'v'. Other cases will be handled by separate
commits. Also, there are a few cases that couldn't be handled
mechanically that aren't covered by this commit.
Signed-off-by: Victor Huesca <victor.huesca@bootlin.com>
[Arnout: don't change flatbuffers, json-for-modern-cpp, libpagekite,
python-scapy3k, softether]
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
The check-package script when ran gives warnings on text wrapping on all
of these Config files. This patch cleans up all warnings related to the
text wrapping for the Config files starting with the letter a in the
package directory.
The appropriate indentation is: <tab><2 spaces><62 chars>
See http://nightly.buildroot.org/#writing-rules-config-in for more
information.
Signed-off-by: Adam Duskett <aduskett@codeblue.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This patch lines up the comments of packages that need a Linux kernel to be
built by buildroot, to the format:
foo needs a Linux kernel to be built
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
[Thomas: taken from Mischa original github patch.]
Signed-off-by: Mischa Jonker <mjonker@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
When a package A depends on config option B and toolchain option C, then
the comment that is given when C is not fulfilled should also depend on B.
For example:
config BR2_PACKAGE_A
depends on BR2_B
depends on BR2_LARGEFILE
depends on BR2_WCHAR
comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar"
depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR
This comment should actually be:
comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar"
depends on BR2_B
depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR
or if possible (typically when B is a package config option declared in that
same Config.in file):
if BR2_B
comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar"
depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR
[other config options depending on B]
endif
Otherwise, the comment would be visible even though the other dependencies
are not met.
This patch adds such missing dependencies, and changes existing such
dependencies from
depends on BR2_BASE_DEP && !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
to
depends on BR2_BASE_DEP
depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
so that (positive) base dependencies are separate from the (negative)
toolchain dependencies. This strategy makes it easier to write such comments
(because one can simply copy the base dependency from the actual package
config option), but also avoids complex and long boolean expressions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
(untested)
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
There is no benefit in using the shortened git revision hash. On the
contrary: the shorter the hash, the higher the risk of having collisions
with another commit.
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
