Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gustavo Zacarias
f6573601de libfuse: switch to github
The project moved to github, so point the homepage and download URL
there.

[Thomas:
 - Remove comment "Switch to github helper on bump" since we clearly
   don't want to switch to the github helper if they continue to
   upload release tarballs.
 - Adjust comment in the .hash file for clarity.]

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2015-12-29 17:00:15 +01:00
Gustavo Zacarias
f4716f79a0 packages: remove (non-)lfs dependencies and tweaks
Now that largefile is mandatory removes package dependencies and
conditionals.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2015-04-01 22:47:22 +02:00
Thomas Petazzoni
665e13c85e Rename BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB to BR2_STATIC_LIBS
Since a while, the semantic of BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB has been changed
from "prefer static libraries when possible" to "use only static
libraries". The former semantic didn't make much sense, since the user
had absolutely no control/idea of which package would use static
libraries, and which packages would not. Therefore, for quite some
time, we have been starting to enforce that BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB
should really build everything with static libraries.

As a consequence, this patch renames BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB to
BR2_STATIC_LIBS, and adjust the Config.in option accordingly.

This also helps preparing the addition of other options to select
shared, shared+static or just static.

Note that we have verified that this commit can be reproduced by
simply doing a global rename of BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB to
BR2_STATIC_LIBS plus adding BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB to Config.in.legacy.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
2014-12-11 22:48:13 +01:00
Thomas De Schampheleire
be084204eb Config.in files: add missing dependencies to toolchain option comments
When a package A depends on config option B and toolchain option C, then
the comment that is given when C is not fulfilled should also depend on B.
For example:

config BR2_PACKAGE_A
	depends on BR2_B
	depends on BR2_LARGEFILE
	depends on BR2_WCHAR

comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar"
	depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR

This comment should actually be:

comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar"
	depends on BR2_B
	depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR

or if possible (typically when B is a package config option declared in that
same Config.in file):

if BR2_B

comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar"
	depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR

[other config options depending on B]

endif

Otherwise, the comment would be visible even though the other dependencies
are not met.

This patch adds such missing dependencies, and changes existing such
dependencies from
  depends on BR2_BASE_DEP && !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
to
  depends on BR2_BASE_DEP
  depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
so that (positive) base dependencies are separate from the (negative)
toolchain dependencies. This strategy makes it easier to write such comments
(because one can simply copy the base dependency from the actual package
config option), but also avoids complex and long boolean expressions.

Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
 (untested)
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2013-11-10 23:59:57 +01:00
Thomas De Schampheleire
66bb10b7b0 Config.in files: unify comments of toolchain option dependencies
This patch lines up the comments in Config.in files that clarify which
toolchain options the package depends on.

Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2013-10-14 22:45:57 +02:00
Gustavo Zacarias
3776138c7b libfuse: not available for static builds
Unfortunately libfuse uses dl functions exclusively so it can't be used
for static builds so exclude it so.
Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a1c3d2b9c436023675c363d9d3b365c95ade0329/

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2013-04-14 23:11:06 +02:00
Gustavo Zacarias
6a219e26b6 libfuse: needs mmu
Fixes
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/5c64ea05e0ffedcc78f5255f6f76afa1f159cda0

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2012-12-26 23:38:43 +01:00
Gustavo Zacarias
b6e514692c libfuse: needs threads
libfuse needs threads, fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/0111a67b9ed5f5f5dfc0725d009ea5c756c1755c

[Peter: update sshfs/unionfs comments to match]
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2012-12-09 21:34:41 +01:00
Thomas Petazzoni
29a2f3d21b libfuse: rename fuse to libfuse
We rename the package/fuse directory to package/libfuse to be
consistent with the package name. This is needed for a future commit
that will simplify the AUTOTARGETS macro by making assumptions on the
directory name.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2011-09-20 22:42:05 +02:00