Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexandre Belloni
6e6397fd76 at91bootstrap3: bump to v3.8
In preparation for sama5d2 xplained support, bump at91bootstrap3 to 3.8

[Peter: add .hash file]
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2015-12-04 21:54:38 +01:00
Angelo Compagnucci
c839605ff0 boot/at91bootstrap3: download via custom git url
This patch adds the option to download at91bootstrap3 from
a custom git URL. This is a requirement for all that boards
that use a custom at91bootstrap3 version.

Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2015-06-14 23:42:48 +02:00
Thomas Petazzoni
23a94e9d67 at91bootstrap3: bump to v3.6.2
In preparation to add support for the SAMA5D3 Xplained board, this
commit bumps the version of the at91bootstrap3 bootloader to
v3.6.2. While doing this, it also:

 - Allows this bootloader on Cortex-A5 based platforms, since SAMA5D3
   are based on Cortex-A5.

 - Removes a patch that no longer applies, and which has been taken
   into account in at91bootstrap3 upstream.

 - Switches to the upstream Github location as the source.

 - Updates the installation commands to match upstream changes in the
   installation process.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2014-06-29 10:54:08 +02:00
Simon Dawson
ca0d69c61c at91bootstrap3: new package
Note that this new package, at91bootstrap3, is being added alongside the
existing at91bootstrap. This was suggested by Thomas Petazzoni, whose
comments on the mailing list are quoted below.

  For this package, I am not sure we can do a simple version bump. Since
  there is (was?) no upstream for AT91Bootstrap 1.x, many
  vendors/companies had to maintain their patches on top of AT91Bootstrap
  1.x. See for example
  board/calao/usb-a9263/at91bootstrap-1.16-usb-a9263.patch. Therefore,
  removing AT91Bootstrap 1.x from the tree will prevent those platforms
  to work. I know people should upgrade, but AT91Bootstrap 3.x is quite
  significantly different, so the porting effort is not that simple.

  Therefore, I'm wondering whether we should kee at91bootstrap as it is,
  and create a separate package at91bootstrap3 for the 3.x generation.

Signed-off-by: Simon Dawson <spdawson@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2012-08-17 17:58:16 +02:00