The project seems not maintained anymore since there
is no commit since 2011:
https://github.com/wlach/wvstreams
After fixing the first build issue by adding a missing limit.h header...
xplc/modulemgr.cc:90:14: error: ‘PATH_MAX’ was not declared in this scope
char fname[PATH_MAX];
and fixing a basename() conflict between the gnu and posix version,
the build fail due to missing __libc_stack_end.
wvtask.cc:(.test+0xb08): undefined reference to `__libc_stack_end'
There is a configure test for __libc_stack_end support but it
doesn't work properly with a musl toolchain.
Since we already have several fixes for uClibc, let's mark wvstreams
as not available for musl toolchains, until someone interested
enough fixes it.
[Thomas: replace uClibc-ng by just uClibc in the Config.in comments.]
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@openwide.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This uClibc toolchain does not provide an appropriate uClibc
configuration for Buildroot: missing IPv6, missing nsl stub, missing
program invocation, etc. Therefore, we mark it as broken, waiting for
a new upstream release of a new toolchain.
We keep around the toolchain-external Synopsys code anyway, since it
will most likely be identical for the new toolchain version. However,
we remove all the quirks that were introduced to start work around
issues related to this toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Now that largefile is mandatory removes package dependencies and
conditionals.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Autogenerated from rename-patch.py (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/403345)
Signed-off-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
When a package A depends on config option B and toolchain option C, then
the comment that is given when C is not fulfilled should also depend on B.
For example:
config BR2_PACKAGE_A
depends on BR2_B
depends on BR2_LARGEFILE
depends on BR2_WCHAR
comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar"
depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR
This comment should actually be:
comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar"
depends on BR2_B
depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR
or if possible (typically when B is a package config option declared in that
same Config.in file):
if BR2_B
comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar"
depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR
[other config options depending on B]
endif
Otherwise, the comment would be visible even though the other dependencies
are not met.
This patch adds such missing dependencies, and changes existing such
dependencies from
depends on BR2_BASE_DEP && !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
to
depends on BR2_BASE_DEP
depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
so that (positive) base dependencies are separate from the (negative)
toolchain dependencies. This strategy makes it easier to write such comments
(because one can simply copy the base dependency from the actual package
config option), but also avoids complex and long boolean expressions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
(untested)
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
This patch lines up the comments in Config.in files that clarify which
toolchain options the package depends on.
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
