This patch adds the option to download at91bootstrap3 from
a custom git URL. This is a requirement for all that boards
that use a custom at91bootstrap3 version.
Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This patch bumps at91bootstrap3 version to 3.7.2
Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This patch adds licensing informations to at91bootstrap3
[Thomas:
- change from "BSD-2c with endorsement clause" to "Atmel License",
because the license of AT91Bootstrap is neither a BSD-2c nor a
BSD-3c: it does not carry the second clause of the BSD-2c or BSD-3c
licenses giving the condition of redistribution of the binary form.]
Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Instead of manually testing MAKECMDGOALS, use the newly introduced
BR_BUILDING variable to know if we're building or not.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Tested-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
For some (silly?) reason, the kconfig-package infra always wants
<pkg>_KCONFIG_FILE to be defined. So let's do like barebox does: use a
temporary AT91BOOTSTRAP3_SOURCE_CONFIG variable, and assign it to
AT91BOOTSTRAP3_KCONFIG_FILE. This way, the latter is always defined,
even if to the empty value.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
In at91bootstrap3, defconfig files are spread out in various
sub-directories, so we can't easily construct the path to those
defconfig files.
As it turns out, there are no two defconfig files named the same; they
all contain at least the board name, plus some extra info. And there is
always only one directory depth below board/ where all defconfig files
are to be found.
Also, at91bootstrap3's own Makefile relies on this single-match as it
runs a 'find' command to locate the defconfig file.
So, even though we do not know the path to the defconfig file, we can
construct a shell-glob quite easily (in the hope that there will never
be more than one directory depth).
Signed-off-by: Mauro Condarelli <mc5686@mclink.it>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr:
- remove custom _CONFIGURE_CMDS, handled by pkg-kconfig (Thomas)
- remove redundant intermediate variable
- fix using internal defconfig files
]
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Several packages have some logic to apply custom patches that existed
before the BR2_GLOBAL_PATCH_DIR mechanism: at91bootstrap,
at91bootstrap3, barebox, uboot and linux. Currently, the logic of
those packages to apply custom patches is to match
<package-name>-*.patch, which is not consistent with what we've done
for patches stored in the package directory, and for patches stored in
BR2_GLOBAL_PATCH_DIR: in such cases, we simply apply *.patch.
Therefore, for consistency reasons, this commit changes these packages
to also apply *.patch.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Change to use the _defconfig targets of at91bootstrap3 build system
when a defconfig is used.
[Thomas: adjust to make a better use of at91bootstrap3 defconfig
mechanism.]
Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To easy up adding optional parameters when calling the
"apply-patches.sh" add and use the "APPLY_PATCHES" variable to execute
the script.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
While the autotools infrastructure was using FOO_MAKE_OPT, generic packages
were typically using FOO_MAKE_OPTS. This inconsistency becomes a problem
when a new infrastructure is introduced that wants to make use of
FOO_MAKE_OPT(S), and can live alongside either generic-package or
autotools-package. The new infrastructure will have to choose between either
OPT or OPTS, and thus rule out transparent usage by respectively generic
packages or generic packages. An example of such an infrastructure is
kconfig-package, which provides kconfig-related make targets.
The OPTS variant is more logical, as there are typically multiple options.
This patch renames all occurrences of FOO_MAKE_OPT in FOO_MAKE_OPTS.
Sed command used:
find * -type f | xargs sed -i 's#_MAKE_OPT\>#&S#g'
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
In preparation to add support for the SAMA5D3 Xplained board, this
commit bumps the version of the at91bootstrap3 bootloader to
v3.6.2. While doing this, it also:
- Allows this bootloader on Cortex-A5 based platforms, since SAMA5D3
are based on Cortex-A5.
- Removes a patch that no longer applies, and which has been taken
into account in at91bootstrap3 upstream.
- Switches to the upstream Github location as the source.
- Updates the installation commands to match upstream changes in the
installation process.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Note that this new package, at91bootstrap3, is being added alongside the
existing at91bootstrap. This was suggested by Thomas Petazzoni, whose
comments on the mailing list are quoted below.
For this package, I am not sure we can do a simple version bump. Since
there is (was?) no upstream for AT91Bootstrap 1.x, many
vendors/companies had to maintain their patches on top of AT91Bootstrap
1.x. See for example
board/calao/usb-a9263/at91bootstrap-1.16-usb-a9263.patch. Therefore,
removing AT91Bootstrap 1.x from the tree will prevent those platforms
to work. I know people should upgrade, but AT91Bootstrap 3.x is quite
significantly different, so the porting effort is not that simple.
Therefore, I'm wondering whether we should kee at91bootstrap as it is,
and create a separate package at91bootstrap3 for the 3.x generation.
Signed-off-by: Simon Dawson <spdawson@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
