The Xtensa architecture had been removed because it required special
handling and depended on additional directories and files that became
obsolete over time. This change is more aligned to other architectures.
[Thomas: rebased on top of the "arch: improve definition of gcc mtune,
mcpu, etc." patch].
Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
As stated in commit 555c2585bf, the
Xtensa architecture has been introduced in 2009 and never changed
since its initial introduction. It requires some special handling that
is a bit annoying, and despite our call to the initial developers, and
the announcement of the deprecation of the architecture during the
2012.05, nothing has happened. Therefore, drop support for this
architecture.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: me
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Thanks to the pkgparentdir and pkgname functions, we can rewrite the
GENTARGETS macro in a way that avoids the need for each package to
repeat its name and the directory in which it is present.
[Peter: pkgdir->pkgparentdir]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
With highly parallel builds, sysdep.h is not always generated before it
is needed, breaking the build.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
ltrace failed to build because of missing arguments to gcc to find the
header files. This is due to the fact that the existing ltrace.mk was
setting CC and LD at build time to incorrect values. Keeping the
values set at configure time is just the right thing to do.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Has been marked as broken for more than 1 year, with no indication
that anyone cares, and it needs a bunch of special handling.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
We have been passing -q to ./configure when using 'make -s' for
packages using Makefile.autotools.in for some time. Do the same
for packages using autotools, but not using the
Makefile.autotools.in infrastructure, taking care to not do it
for packages with hand written configure scripts.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
A C library will have been built by the toolchain makefiles, so there is no
need for packages to explicitly depend on uclibc.
Signed-off-by: Will Newton <will.newton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
