Enable this bootloader for cortex a7 based SoCs: support for the
sama7g5 SoC is now in upstream at91bootstrap3, and it is a Cortex-A7
based SoC.
Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Implement possibility to download AT91Bootstrap from a custom tarball
URL.
Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
... to follow the convention: type, default, depends on, select, help.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martincoski <ricardo.martincoski@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This patch adds the option to download at91bootstrap3 from
a custom git URL. This is a requirement for all that boards
that use a custom at91bootstrap3 version.
Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
In preparation to add support for the SAMA5D3 Xplained board, this
commit bumps the version of the at91bootstrap3 bootloader to
v3.6.2. While doing this, it also:
- Allows this bootloader on Cortex-A5 based platforms, since SAMA5D3
are based on Cortex-A5.
- Removes a patch that no longer applies, and which has been taken
into account in at91bootstrap3 upstream.
- Switches to the upstream Github location as the source.
- Updates the installation commands to match upstream changes in the
installation process.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Note that this new package, at91bootstrap3, is being added alongside the
existing at91bootstrap. This was suggested by Thomas Petazzoni, whose
comments on the mailing list are quoted below.
For this package, I am not sure we can do a simple version bump. Since
there is (was?) no upstream for AT91Bootstrap 1.x, many
vendors/companies had to maintain their patches on top of AT91Bootstrap
1.x. See for example
board/calao/usb-a9263/at91bootstrap-1.16-usb-a9263.patch. Therefore,
removing AT91Bootstrap 1.x from the tree will prevent those platforms
to work. I know people should upgrade, but AT91Bootstrap 3.x is quite
significantly different, so the porting effort is not that simple.
Therefore, I'm wondering whether we should kee at91bootstrap as it is,
and create a separate package at91bootstrap3 for the 3.x generation.
Signed-off-by: Simon Dawson <spdawson@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
