docs/manual: fix patch naming convention
Otherwise conflicts with the naming convention from previous section. Signed-off-by: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
87a49fbace
commit
fe7babeeb0
@ -73,12 +73,12 @@ details.
|
||||
* If a +series+ file exists in the package directory, then patches are
|
||||
applied according to the +series+ file;
|
||||
+
|
||||
* Otherwise, patch files matching +<packagename>-*.patch+
|
||||
are applied in alphabetical order.
|
||||
* Otherwise, patch files matching +*.patch+ are applied in alphabetical
|
||||
order.
|
||||
So, to ensure they are applied in the right order, it is highly
|
||||
recommended to name the patch files like this:
|
||||
+<packagename>-<number>-<description>.patch+, where +<number>+
|
||||
refers to the 'apply order'.
|
||||
+<number>-<description>.patch+, where +<number>+ refers to the
|
||||
'apply order'.
|
||||
|
||||
. If +BR2_GLOBAL_PATCH_DIR+ is defined, the directories will be
|
||||
enumerated in the order they are specified. The patches are applied
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user