arch/arm: remove OABI option
OABI is more than legacy, it's dead. New developments should go with EABI, since it so much better. >From the Debian EABI page [0] : - floating point performance, with or without an FPU is very much faster - mixing soft and hardfloat code is possible - structure packing is not as painful as it used to be - a more efficient syscall convention - more compatibility with various tools [0] http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort [Thomas: keep the ABI choice, as we are going to introduce EABIhf later]. Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7f4cb885f3
commit
adf9646229
@ -72,19 +72,12 @@ choice
|
||||
help
|
||||
Application Binary Interface to use
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
Using OABI is discouraged.
|
||||
|
||||
config BR2_ARM_EABI_CHOICE
|
||||
bool "EABI"
|
||||
config BR2_ARM_OABI
|
||||
bool "OABI"
|
||||
depends on !BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_7_X
|
||||
endchoice
|
||||
|
||||
config BR2_ARM_EABI
|
||||
def_bool y
|
||||
depends on !BR2_ARM_OABI
|
||||
|
||||
config BR2_ARM_ENABLE_NEON
|
||||
bool "Enable NEON SIMD extension support"
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user