utils/check-package: don't ignore check-package

Commit 32934b526b (utils/checkpackagelib: check for Upstream trailers)
introduced a new python module to check Upstream tags in patch files. In
doing so, it introduced a flake8 coding style issue. That was not caught
when applying the change, and neither was it caught by our daily checks,
because the .checkpackagefile was regenerated right just in the next
commit, to apply ignore patterns to existing patch files.

It is a bit sad that one of our checks does not itself passes all our
checks...

Fix that trivial issue now.

Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
This commit is contained in:
Yann E. MORIN 2024-03-31 22:21:52 +02:00
parent b7cc572208
commit 81bb14a935
2 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1462,4 +1462,3 @@ support/scripts/setlocalversion Shellcheck
support/testing/tests/core/post-build.sh Shellcheck support/testing/tests/core/post-build.sh Shellcheck
support/testing/tests/package/test_opkg/post-build.sh Shellcheck support/testing/tests/package/test_opkg/post-build.sh Shellcheck
support/testing/tests/utils/test_get_developers/0001-package-binutils-change-.mk.patch NumberedSubject Upstream support/testing/tests/utils/test_get_developers/0001-package-binutils-change-.mk.patch NumberedSubject Upstream
utils/checkpackagelib/lib_patch.py Flake8

View File

@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ class Sob(_CheckFunction):
"({}#_format_and_licensing_of_the_package_patches)" "({}#_format_and_licensing_of_the_package_patches)"
.format(self.filename, self.url_to_manual)] .format(self.filename, self.url_to_manual)]
class Upstream(_CheckFunction): class Upstream(_CheckFunction):
UPSTREAM_ENTRY = re.compile(r"^Upstream: .*$") UPSTREAM_ENTRY = re.compile(r"^Upstream: .*$")