utils/check-package: don't ignore check-package
Commit 32934b526b
(utils/checkpackagelib: check for Upstream trailers)
introduced a new python module to check Upstream tags in patch files. In
doing so, it introduced a flake8 coding style issue. That was not caught
when applying the change, and neither was it caught by our daily checks,
because the .checkpackagefile was regenerated right just in the next
commit, to apply ignore patterns to existing patch files.
It is a bit sad that one of our checks does not itself passes all our
checks...
Fix that trivial issue now.
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b7cc572208
commit
81bb14a935
@ -1462,4 +1462,3 @@ support/scripts/setlocalversion Shellcheck
|
|||||||
support/testing/tests/core/post-build.sh Shellcheck
|
support/testing/tests/core/post-build.sh Shellcheck
|
||||||
support/testing/tests/package/test_opkg/post-build.sh Shellcheck
|
support/testing/tests/package/test_opkg/post-build.sh Shellcheck
|
||||||
support/testing/tests/utils/test_get_developers/0001-package-binutils-change-.mk.patch NumberedSubject Upstream
|
support/testing/tests/utils/test_get_developers/0001-package-binutils-change-.mk.patch NumberedSubject Upstream
|
||||||
utils/checkpackagelib/lib_patch.py Flake8
|
|
||||||
|
@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ class Sob(_CheckFunction):
|
|||||||
"({}#_format_and_licensing_of_the_package_patches)"
|
"({}#_format_and_licensing_of_the_package_patches)"
|
||||||
.format(self.filename, self.url_to_manual)]
|
.format(self.filename, self.url_to_manual)]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
class Upstream(_CheckFunction):
|
class Upstream(_CheckFunction):
|
||||||
UPSTREAM_ENTRY = re.compile(r"^Upstream: .*$")
|
UPSTREAM_ENTRY = re.compile(r"^Upstream: .*$")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user