zmqpp: use more logical way of expressing comment dependencies
In most packages, we use 'depends on !A || !B || !C' and not 'depends on !(A && B && C)' to express the dependencies of comments on missing toolchain features. As suggested by Yann E. Morin, let's switch zmqpp to this convention. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
634b714d97
commit
7b69cc9f18
@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_ZMQPP
|
|||||||
http://github.com/benjamg/zmqpp
|
http://github.com/benjamg/zmqpp
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
comment "zmqpp needs a toolchain w/ C++, wchar, threads, gcc >= 4.6"
|
comment "zmqpp needs a toolchain w/ C++, wchar, threads, gcc >= 4.6"
|
||||||
depends on !(BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP && BR2_USE_WCHAR && \
|
depends on !BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP || !BR2_USE_WCHAR || \
|
||||||
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS && BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_6)
|
!BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS || !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_6
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if BR2_PACKAGE_ZMQPP
|
if BR2_PACKAGE_ZMQPP
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user