zmqpp: use more logical way of expressing comment dependencies

In most packages, we use 'depends on !A || !B || !C' and not 'depends
on !(A && B && C)' to express the dependencies of comments on missing
toolchain features. As suggested by Yann E. Morin, let's switch zmqpp
to this convention.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Petazzoni 2015-08-05 11:07:39 +02:00
parent 634b714d97
commit 7b69cc9f18

View File

@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_ZMQPP
http://github.com/benjamg/zmqpp http://github.com/benjamg/zmqpp
comment "zmqpp needs a toolchain w/ C++, wchar, threads, gcc >= 4.6" comment "zmqpp needs a toolchain w/ C++, wchar, threads, gcc >= 4.6"
depends on !(BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP && BR2_USE_WCHAR && \ depends on !BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP || !BR2_USE_WCHAR || \
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS && BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_6) !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS || !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_6
if BR2_PACKAGE_ZMQPP if BR2_PACKAGE_ZMQPP