fs/ext2: bump journal overhead to 1300 blocks
A quick test with a ~3.5MB ext4 filesystem shows that 1081 blocks isn't enough: tune2fs 1.42.7 (21-Jan-2013) Please run e2fsck on the filesystem. Creating journal inode: Journal size too big for filesystem. So bump it a bit. Overestimating the journal size is probably not really a big deal for the kind of systems using ext3/4 anyway. Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2a266e0cf
commit
0fab0a4afd
@ -34,14 +34,11 @@ then
|
||||
# we scale inodes / blocks with 10% to compensate for bitmaps size + slack
|
||||
BLOCKS=$(du -s -c -k $TARGET_DIR | grep total | sed -e "s/total//")
|
||||
BLOCKS=$(expr 500 + \( $BLOCKS + $INODES / 8 \) \* 11 / 10)
|
||||
# we add 1081 blocks (a bit more than 1 MiB, assuming 1KiB blocks) for
|
||||
# we add 1300 blocks (a bit more than 1 MiB, assuming 1KiB blocks) for
|
||||
# the journal if ext3/4
|
||||
# Note: I came to 1081 blocks after trial-and-error checks. With 1080 or
|
||||
# less additional blocks, and tune2fs would refuse to add the journal;
|
||||
# with 1081 additional blocks or above, tune2fs wil happily add a journal.
|
||||
# YMMV.
|
||||
# Note: I came to 1300 blocks after trial-and-error checks. YMMV.
|
||||
if [ ${GEN} -ge 3 ]; then
|
||||
BLOCKS=$(expr 1081 + $BLOCKS )
|
||||
BLOCKS=$(expr 1300 + $BLOCKS )
|
||||
fi
|
||||
set -- $@ -b $BLOCKS
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user