ltrace: remove bogus comment in Config.in file
In commitdfaa18af00
("ltrace: disable on mips/mipsel"), ltrace was disabled on mips/mipsel due to build issues, and a comment was added in the Config.in file to explain that even though ltrace has mips/mipsel support, it isn't enabled because it doesn't build. Then, in commitd23cce19c2
("ltrace: enable for mips/mipsel"), the build of ltrace on mips/mipsel was re-enabled, because it has been fixed upstream. However, the comment in the Config.in comment was not removed in this commit. Due to this, we have a comment that says "we don't allow enabling ltrace on mips/mipsel" and the line right below precisely allows to enable ltrace on mips/mipsel. Fix this inconsistency by removing the no longer valid comment. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
384c1559c0
commit
0f711e71c2
@ -3,10 +3,6 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_LTRACE
|
||||
depends on BR2_USE_WCHAR # elfutils
|
||||
depends on !BR2_STATIC_LIBS # elfutils
|
||||
depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC || BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC # elfutils
|
||||
# ltrace normally has mips/mipsel support, but it's currently
|
||||
# broken (error: 'struct ltelf' has no member named
|
||||
# 'relplt_count'). Issue reported upstream at
|
||||
# https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756764.
|
||||
depends on (BR2_i386 || BR2_arm || BR2_mips || BR2_mipsel \
|
||||
|| BR2_powerpc || BR2_sparc || BR2_x86_64 || BR2_xtensa)
|
||||
select BR2_PACKAGE_ELFUTILS
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user