From 0b17cd017e8b946d718c81f0e38fd570e6a6bc0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Mayer Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:34:14 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] package/rsync: force HAVE_C99_VSNPRINTF to "yes" We know the system will have a modern-enough C library that implements the required snprintf() functionality. Since the configure stage can't detect the system's capabilities (because it is cross-compiling), let's hard-code the decision. As a result, rsync won't be linking in its own copy of snprintf(). Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni --- package/rsync/rsync.mk | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/package/rsync/rsync.mk b/package/rsync/rsync.mk index 81ad4b9291..7ff7ca6eef 100644 --- a/package/rsync/rsync.mk +++ b/package/rsync/rsync.mk @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ RSYNC_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING RSYNC_CPE_ID_VENDOR = samba RSYNC_SELINUX_MODULES = rsync RSYNC_DEPENDENCIES = zlib popt +# We know that our C library is modern enough for C99 vsnprintf(). Since +# configure can't detect this, we tell configure that vsnprintf() is safe. +RSYNC_CONF_ENV = rsync_cv_HAVE_C99_VSNPRINTF=yes RSYNC_CONF_OPTS = \ --with-included-zlib=no \ --with-included-popt=no \