2014-02-23 16:04:38 +01:00
|
|
|
// -*- mode:doc; -*-
|
|
|
|
// vim: set syntax=asciidoc:
|
|
|
|
|
manual: use one-line titles instead of two-line titles (trivial)
Asciidoc supports two syntaxes for section titles: two-line titles (title
plus underline consisting of a particular symbol), and one-line titles
(title prefixed with a specific number of = signs).
The two-line title underlines are:
Level 0 (top level): ======================
Level 1: ----------------------
Level 2: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Level 3: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Level 4 (bottom level): ++++++++++++++++++++++
and the one-line title prefixes:
= Document Title (level 0) =
== Section title (level 1) ==
=== Section title (level 2) ===
==== Section title (level 3) ====
===== Section title (level 4) =====
The buildroot manual is currenly using the two-line titles, but this has
multiple disadvantages:
- asciidoc also uses some of the underline symbols for other purposes (like
preformatted code, example blocks, ...), which makes it difficult to do
mass replacements, such as a planned follow-up patch that needs to move
all sections one level down.
- it is difficult to remember which level a given underline symbol (=-~^+)
corresponds to, while counting = signs is easy.
This patch changes all two-level titles to one-level titles in the manual.
The bulk of the change was done with the following Python script, except for
the level 1 titles (-----) as these underlines are also used for literal
code blocks.
This patch only changes the titles, no other changes. In
adding-packages-directory.txt, I did add missing newlines between some
titles and their content.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
#!/usr/bin/env python
import sys
import mmap
import re
for input in sys.argv[1:]:
f = open(input, 'r+')
f.flush()
s = mmap.mmap(f.fileno(), 0)
# Level 0 (top level): ====================== =
# Level 1: ---------------------- ==
# Level 2: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ===
# Level 3: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ====
# Level 4 (bottom level): ++++++++++++++++++++++ =====
def replace_title(s, symbol, replacement):
pattern = re.compile(r'(.+\n)\%s{2,}\n' % symbol, re.MULTILINE)
return pattern.sub(r'%s \1' % replacement, s)
new = s
new = replace_title(new, '=', '=')
new = replace_title(new, '+', '=====')
new = replace_title(new, '^', '====')
new = replace_title(new, '~', '===')
#new = replace_title(new, '-', '==')
s.seek(0)
s.write(new)
s.resize(s.tell())
s.close()
f.close()
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2014-05-02 07:47:30 +02:00
|
|
|
=== Using Buildroot during development
|
2014-02-23 16:04:38 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The normal operation of Buildroot is to download a tarball, extract
|
|
|
|
it, configure, compile and install the software component found inside
|
|
|
|
this tarball. The source code is extracted in
|
|
|
|
+output/build/<package>-<version>+, which is a temporary directory:
|
|
|
|
whenever +make clean+ is used, this directory is entirely removed, and
|
|
|
|
re-recreated at the next +make+ invocation. Even when a Git or
|
|
|
|
Subversion repository is used as the input for the package source
|
|
|
|
code, Buildroot creates a tarball out of it, and then behaves as it
|
|
|
|
normally does with tarballs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This behavior is well-suited when Buildroot is used mainly as an
|
|
|
|
integration tool, to build and integrate all the components of an
|
|
|
|
embedded Linux system. However, if one uses Buildroot during the
|
|
|
|
development of certain components of the system, this behavior is not
|
|
|
|
very convenient: one would instead like to make a small change to the
|
|
|
|
source code of one package, and be able to quickly rebuild the system
|
|
|
|
with Buildroot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Making changes directly in +output/build/<package>-<version>+ is not
|
2014-02-24 09:58:04 +01:00
|
|
|
an appropriate solution, because this directory is removed on +make
|
2014-02-23 16:04:38 +01:00
|
|
|
clean+.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore, Buildroot provides a specific mechanism for this use case:
|
|
|
|
the +<pkg>_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR+ mechanism. Buildroot reads an _override_
|
|
|
|
file, which allows the user to tell Buildroot the location of the
|
|
|
|
source for certain packages. By default this _override_ file is named
|
|
|
|
+local.mk+ and located in the top directory of the Buildroot source
|
|
|
|
tree, but a different location can be specified through the
|
|
|
|
+BR2_PACKAGE_OVERRIDE_FILE+ configuration option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this _override_ file, Buildroot expects to find lines of the form:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
<pkg1>_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR = /path/to/pkg1/sources
|
|
|
|
<pkg2>_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR = /path/to/pkg2/sources
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
LINUX_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR = /home/bob/linux/
|
|
|
|
BUSYBOX_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR = /home/bob/busybox/
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When Buildroot finds that for a given package, an
|
|
|
|
+<pkg>_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR+ has been defined, it will no longer attempt to
|
|
|
|
download, extract and patch the package. Instead, it will directly use
|
|
|
|
the source code available in in the specified directory and +make
|
|
|
|
clean+ will not touch this directory. This allows to point Buildroot
|
|
|
|
to your own directories, that can be managed by Git, Subversion, or
|
|
|
|
any other version control system. To achieve this, Buildroot will use
|
|
|
|
_rsync_ to copy the source code of the component from the specified
|
|
|
|
+<pkg>_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR+ to +output/build/<package>-custom/+.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This mechanism is best used in conjuction with the +make
|
|
|
|
<pkg>-rebuild+ and +make <pkg>-reconfigure+ targets. A +make
|
|
|
|
<pkg>-rebuild all+ sequence will _rsync_ the source code from
|
|
|
|
+<pkg>_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR+ to +output/build/<package>-custom+ (thanks to
|
|
|
|
_rsync_, only the modified files are copied), and restart the build
|
|
|
|
process of just this package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the example of the +linux+ package above, the developer can then
|
|
|
|
make a source code change in +/home/bob/linux+ and then run:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
make linux-rebuild all
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and in a matter of seconds gets the updated Linux kernel image in
|
|
|
|
+output/images+. Similarly, a change can be made to the Busybox source
|
|
|
|
code in +/home/bob/busybox+, and after:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
make busybox-rebuild all
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the root filesystem image in +output/images+ contains the updated
|
|
|
|
Busybox.
|