Makefile: offload .gitlab-ci.yml generation
GitLab has severe limitations imposed to triggers.
Using a variable in a regexp is not allowed:
| only:
| - /-$CI_JOB_NAME$/
| - /-\$CI_JOB_NAME$/
| - /-%CI_JOB_NAME%$/
Using the key 'variables' always lead to an AND with 'refs', so:
| only:
| refs:
| - branches
| - tags
| variables:
| - $CI_JOB_NAME == $CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME
would make the push of a tag not to trigger all jobs anymore.
Inheritance is used only for the second level of keys, so:
|.runtime_test: &runtime_test
| only:
| - tags
|tests.package.test_python_txaio.TestPythonPy2Txaio:
| <<: *runtime_test
| only:
| - /-TestPythonPy2Txaio$/
would override the entire key 'only', making the push of a tag not to
trigger all jobs anymore.
So, in order to have a trigger per job and still allow the push of a tag
to trigger all jobs (all this in a follow up patch), the regexp for each
job must be hardcoded in the .gitlab-ci.yml and also the inherited
values for key 'only' must be repeated for every job.
This is not a big issue, .gitlab-ci.yml is already automatically
generated from a template and there will be no need to hand-editing it
when jobs are added or removed.
Since the logic to generate the yaml file from the template will become
more complex, move the commands from the main Makefile to a script.
Using Python or other advanced scripting language for that script would
be the most versatile solution, but that would bring another dependency
on the host machine, pyyaml if Python is used. So every developer that
needs to run 'make .gitlab-ci.yml' and also the docker image used in the
GitLab pipelines would need to have pyyaml pre-installed.
Instead of adding the mentioned dependency, keep using a bash script.
While moving the commands to the script:
- mimic the behavior of the previous make target and fail on any
command that fails, by using 'set -e';
- break the original lines in one command per line, making the diff for
any patch to be applied to this file to look nicer;
- keep the script as simple as possible, without functions, just a
script that executes from the top to bottom;
- do not perform validations on the input parameters, any command that
fails already makes the script to fail;
- do not add an usage message, the script is not intended to be called
directly.
This patch does not change functionality.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martincoski <ricardo.martincoski@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
[Thomas: make the script output on stdout rather than take the output
file name as second argument.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2018-10-29 00:58:38 +01:00
|
|
|
#!/usr/bin/env bash
|
|
|
|
set -e
|
|
|
|
set -o pipefail
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-06 22:12:20 +02:00
|
|
|
main() {
|
|
|
|
local template="${1}"
|
Makefile: offload .gitlab-ci.yml generation
GitLab has severe limitations imposed to triggers.
Using a variable in a regexp is not allowed:
| only:
| - /-$CI_JOB_NAME$/
| - /-\$CI_JOB_NAME$/
| - /-%CI_JOB_NAME%$/
Using the key 'variables' always lead to an AND with 'refs', so:
| only:
| refs:
| - branches
| - tags
| variables:
| - $CI_JOB_NAME == $CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME
would make the push of a tag not to trigger all jobs anymore.
Inheritance is used only for the second level of keys, so:
|.runtime_test: &runtime_test
| only:
| - tags
|tests.package.test_python_txaio.TestPythonPy2Txaio:
| <<: *runtime_test
| only:
| - /-TestPythonPy2Txaio$/
would override the entire key 'only', making the push of a tag not to
trigger all jobs anymore.
So, in order to have a trigger per job and still allow the push of a tag
to trigger all jobs (all this in a follow up patch), the regexp for each
job must be hardcoded in the .gitlab-ci.yml and also the inherited
values for key 'only' must be repeated for every job.
This is not a big issue, .gitlab-ci.yml is already automatically
generated from a template and there will be no need to hand-editing it
when jobs are added or removed.
Since the logic to generate the yaml file from the template will become
more complex, move the commands from the main Makefile to a script.
Using Python or other advanced scripting language for that script would
be the most versatile solution, but that would bring another dependency
on the host machine, pyyaml if Python is used. So every developer that
needs to run 'make .gitlab-ci.yml' and also the docker image used in the
GitLab pipelines would need to have pyyaml pre-installed.
Instead of adding the mentioned dependency, keep using a bash script.
While moving the commands to the script:
- mimic the behavior of the previous make target and fail on any
command that fails, by using 'set -e';
- break the original lines in one command per line, making the diff for
any patch to be applied to this file to look nicer;
- keep the script as simple as possible, without functions, just a
script that executes from the top to bottom;
- do not perform validations on the input parameters, any command that
fails already makes the script to fail;
- do not add an usage message, the script is not intended to be called
directly.
This patch does not change functionality.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martincoski <ricardo.martincoski@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
[Thomas: make the script output on stdout rather than take the output
file name as second argument.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2018-10-29 00:58:38 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-06 22:12:21 +02:00
|
|
|
preamble "${template}"
|
2020-09-06 22:12:24 +02:00
|
|
|
gen_tests
|
2020-09-06 22:12:20 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-06 22:12:21 +02:00
|
|
|
preamble() {
|
|
|
|
local template="${1}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cat - "${template}" <<-_EOF_
|
|
|
|
# This file is generated; do not edit!
|
|
|
|
# Builds appear on https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/pipelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
image: ${CI_JOB_IMAGE}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_EOF_
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
gen_tests() {
|
|
|
|
local -a basics defconfigs runtimes
|
utils/test-pkg: add gitlab-ci support
The gitlab-ci support in test-pkg allows to parallelize the test-pkg
work into several gitlab jobs. It's much faster than local serialized
testing.
To trigger this, a developer will have to add, in the latest commit of
their branch, a token on its own line, followed by a configuration
fragment, e.g.:
test-pkg config:
SOME_OPTION=y
# OTHER_OPTION is not set
SOME_VARIABLE="some value"
This configuration fragment is used as input to test-pkg.
To be able to generate one job per test to run, we need the list of
tests in the parent pipeline, and the individual .config files (one per
test) in the child pipeline. We use the newly-introduced --prepare-only
mode to test-pkg, and collect all the generated .config files as
artefacts; those are inherited in the child pipeline via the
"needs::pipeline" and "needs::job" directives. This is a bit tricky,
and is best described by the Gitlab-CI documentation [0].
We also list those .config files to generate the actual list of jobs to
run in the child pipeline.
Notes:
- if the user provides an empty fragment, this is considered an error:
indeed, without a fragment (and the package name), there is no way
to know what to test;
- if that fragment yields an empty list of tests, then there is
nothing to test either, so that is also considered an error.
[0] https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/README.html#artifact-downloads-to-child-pipelines
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr:
- split the change to test-pkg to its own patch
- generate the actual yml snippet in support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml,
listing the .config files created by test-pkg
- some code-style-candies...
]
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
2021-08-21 15:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
local do_basics do_defconfigs do_runtime do_testpkg
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
local defconfigs_ext cfg tst
|
2020-09-06 22:12:27 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-23 17:08:45 +01:00
|
|
|
basics=( check-package DEVELOPERS flake8 package )
|
2020-09-06 22:12:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
defconfigs=( $(cd configs; LC_ALL=C ls -1 *_defconfig) )
|
|
|
|
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
runtimes=( $(./support/testing/run-tests -l 2>&1 \
|
|
|
|
| sed -r -e '/^test_run \((.*)\).*/!d; s//\1/' \
|
|
|
|
| LC_ALL=C sort)
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-06 22:12:22 +02:00
|
|
|
if [ -n "${CI_COMMIT_TAG}" ]; then
|
2021-11-09 23:03:28 +01:00
|
|
|
# When a tag is added to the Buildroot git tree, we want
|
|
|
|
# to run the runtime tests and only test Qemu defconfigs.
|
|
|
|
defconfigs=( $(cd configs; LC_ALL=C ls -1 qemu_*_defconfig) )
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
do_basics=true
|
|
|
|
do_defconfigs=base
|
|
|
|
do_runtime=true
|
|
|
|
elif [ "${CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE}" = "trigger" ]; then
|
|
|
|
case "${BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS}" in
|
|
|
|
(basic)
|
|
|
|
do_basics=true
|
|
|
|
do_defconfigs=check
|
|
|
|
defconfigs_ext=_check
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
(defconfig)
|
|
|
|
do_defconfigs=base
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
(runtime)
|
|
|
|
do_runtime=true
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
esac
|
2020-09-21 23:08:41 +02:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
case "${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME}" in
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
(*-basics)
|
|
|
|
do_basics=true
|
|
|
|
do_defconfigs=check
|
|
|
|
defconfigs_ext=_check
|
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
(*-defconfigs)
|
|
|
|
do_defconfigs=base
|
|
|
|
;;
|
2022-01-07 23:39:55 +01:00
|
|
|
(*-defconfigs-*)
|
|
|
|
pattern=$(echo ${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME} | sed 's%^.*-defconfigs-\(.*\)%\1%')
|
2021-12-29 15:38:42 +01:00
|
|
|
defconfigs=( $(cd configs; LC_ALL=C ls -1 | grep ^${pattern}) )
|
|
|
|
do_defconfigs=base
|
|
|
|
;;
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
(*-*_defconfig)
|
|
|
|
defconfigs=( "${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME##*-}" )
|
|
|
|
do_defconfigs=base
|
2020-09-21 23:08:41 +02:00
|
|
|
;;
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
(*-runtime-tests)
|
|
|
|
do_runtime=true
|
2020-09-21 23:08:41 +02:00
|
|
|
;;
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
(*-tests.*)
|
2021-10-09 21:10:40 +02:00
|
|
|
runtimes=( $(./support/testing/run-tests -l 2>&1 \
|
|
|
|
| sed -r -e '/^test_run \((.*)\).*/!d; s//\1/' \
|
|
|
|
| LC_ALL=C sort \
|
|
|
|
| grep "^${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME##*-}")
|
|
|
|
)
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
do_runtime=true
|
2020-09-21 23:08:41 +02:00
|
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
esac
|
2020-09-06 22:12:22 +02:00
|
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
|
utils/test-pkg: add gitlab-ci support
The gitlab-ci support in test-pkg allows to parallelize the test-pkg
work into several gitlab jobs. It's much faster than local serialized
testing.
To trigger this, a developer will have to add, in the latest commit of
their branch, a token on its own line, followed by a configuration
fragment, e.g.:
test-pkg config:
SOME_OPTION=y
# OTHER_OPTION is not set
SOME_VARIABLE="some value"
This configuration fragment is used as input to test-pkg.
To be able to generate one job per test to run, we need the list of
tests in the parent pipeline, and the individual .config files (one per
test) in the child pipeline. We use the newly-introduced --prepare-only
mode to test-pkg, and collect all the generated .config files as
artefacts; those are inherited in the child pipeline via the
"needs::pipeline" and "needs::job" directives. This is a bit tricky,
and is best described by the Gitlab-CI documentation [0].
We also list those .config files to generate the actual list of jobs to
run in the child pipeline.
Notes:
- if the user provides an empty fragment, this is considered an error:
indeed, without a fragment (and the package name), there is no way
to know what to test;
- if that fragment yields an empty list of tests, then there is
nothing to test either, so that is also considered an error.
[0] https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/README.html#artifact-downloads-to-child-pipelines
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr:
- split the change to test-pkg to its own patch
- generate the actual yml snippet in support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml,
listing the .config files created by test-pkg
- some code-style-candies...
]
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
2021-08-21 15:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
# Retrieve defconfig for test-pkg from the git commit message (if any)
|
|
|
|
if grep -q -E '^test-pkg config:$' <<<"${CI_COMMIT_DESCRIPTION}"; then
|
|
|
|
sed -r -n -e '/^test-pkg config:$/{:a;n;p;ba;}' \
|
|
|
|
<<<"${CI_COMMIT_DESCRIPTION}" \
|
|
|
|
>defconfig.frag
|
|
|
|
if [ ! -s defconfig.frag ]; then
|
|
|
|
printf "Empty configuration fragment.\n" >&2; exit 1
|
|
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
# Use --all since we expect the user having already pre-tested the
|
|
|
|
# new package with the default subset of toolchains.
|
|
|
|
./utils/test-pkg \
|
|
|
|
--all --prepare-only \
|
|
|
|
--config-snippet defconfig.frag \
|
|
|
|
--build-dir br-test-pkg >&2
|
|
|
|
do_testpkg=( $(ls -1 br-test-pkg/*/.config 2>/dev/null |xargs -r dirname ) )
|
|
|
|
if [ "${#do_testpkg[@]}" -eq 0 ]; then
|
|
|
|
printf "Configuration fragment enables no test.\n" >&2; exit 1
|
|
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# If nothing else, at least do the basics to generate a valid pipeline
|
|
|
|
if [ -z "${do_defconfigs}" \
|
|
|
|
-a -z "${do_runtime}" \
|
utils/test-pkg: add gitlab-ci support
The gitlab-ci support in test-pkg allows to parallelize the test-pkg
work into several gitlab jobs. It's much faster than local serialized
testing.
To trigger this, a developer will have to add, in the latest commit of
their branch, a token on its own line, followed by a configuration
fragment, e.g.:
test-pkg config:
SOME_OPTION=y
# OTHER_OPTION is not set
SOME_VARIABLE="some value"
This configuration fragment is used as input to test-pkg.
To be able to generate one job per test to run, we need the list of
tests in the parent pipeline, and the individual .config files (one per
test) in the child pipeline. We use the newly-introduced --prepare-only
mode to test-pkg, and collect all the generated .config files as
artefacts; those are inherited in the child pipeline via the
"needs::pipeline" and "needs::job" directives. This is a bit tricky,
and is best described by the Gitlab-CI documentation [0].
We also list those .config files to generate the actual list of jobs to
run in the child pipeline.
Notes:
- if the user provides an empty fragment, this is considered an error:
indeed, without a fragment (and the package name), there is no way
to know what to test;
- if that fragment yields an empty list of tests, then there is
nothing to test either, so that is also considered an error.
[0] https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/README.html#artifact-downloads-to-child-pipelines
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr:
- split the change to test-pkg to its own patch
- generate the actual yml snippet in support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml,
listing the .config files created by test-pkg
- some code-style-candies...
]
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
2021-08-21 15:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
-a -z "${do_testpkg}" \
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
then
|
|
|
|
do_basics=true
|
2020-09-06 22:12:29 +02:00
|
|
|
fi
|
2020-09-06 22:12:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
if ${do_basics:-false}; then
|
|
|
|
for tst in "${basics[@]}"; do
|
|
|
|
printf 'check-%s: { extends: .check-%s_base }\n' "${tst}" "${tst}"
|
|
|
|
done
|
|
|
|
fi
|
2020-09-06 22:12:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
if [ -n "${do_defconfigs}" ]; then
|
|
|
|
for cfg in "${defconfigs[@]}"; do
|
|
|
|
printf '%s%s: { extends: .defconfig_%s }\n' \
|
|
|
|
"${cfg}" "${defconfigs_ext}" "${do_defconfigs}"
|
|
|
|
done
|
2020-09-06 22:12:24 +02:00
|
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
|
support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml: rework generation of pipelines
Currently, we handle three kinds of tests: basic, defconfig, and
runtime, and we treat them totally independently ones from the others.
Except for the basic tests that are ignored when defconfig or runtime
tests are explicitly requested.
The basic tests are also run systematically on all our reference
branches: master, next (when it exists), and the maintenance branches:
YYYY.MM.x.
Furthermore, we can see that the conditions to run each set of tests
are very similar, with only the explicit queries differing by name.
Rework the script so that the conditions are expressed only once, and
each set of tests is decided for each condition. This makes it easier
to decide what tests should run under what conditions.
Using GitLab-CI's schedules, with a variable expressing the actual test
to run, would seem the obvious choice to trigger the pipelines. However,
a schedule is configured for a specific branch, which means we would
need one schedule per branch we want to build per test cases we want to
run, *and* that we update those schedules when we add/remove branches
(e.g. when we open/close 'next', or a maintenance branch). This is not
very nice, as it requires some manual tweaking and twiddling on the web
UI.
Instead, we resort to using triggers, that will be triggered from a
cronjob on some server. Using a cronjiob allows us to more easily manage
the branches we want to test and test cases we want to run, to more
easily spread the load over the week, etc...
Note: triggering a pipeline can be done with a simple curl invocation:
$ curl -X POST \
-F "token=${YOUR_TOKEN}" \
-F "ref=${BRANCH_TO_TEST}" \
-F "variables[BR_SCHEDULE_JOBS]=${TEST_TO_RUN}" \
"https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/${YOUR_PROJECT_ID}/trigger/pipeline"
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
2020-10-05 22:48:25 +02:00
|
|
|
if ${do_runtime:-false}; then
|
|
|
|
printf '%s: { extends: .runtime_test_base }\n' "${runtimes[@]}"
|
2020-09-06 22:12:24 +02:00
|
|
|
fi
|
utils/test-pkg: add gitlab-ci support
The gitlab-ci support in test-pkg allows to parallelize the test-pkg
work into several gitlab jobs. It's much faster than local serialized
testing.
To trigger this, a developer will have to add, in the latest commit of
their branch, a token on its own line, followed by a configuration
fragment, e.g.:
test-pkg config:
SOME_OPTION=y
# OTHER_OPTION is not set
SOME_VARIABLE="some value"
This configuration fragment is used as input to test-pkg.
To be able to generate one job per test to run, we need the list of
tests in the parent pipeline, and the individual .config files (one per
test) in the child pipeline. We use the newly-introduced --prepare-only
mode to test-pkg, and collect all the generated .config files as
artefacts; those are inherited in the child pipeline via the
"needs::pipeline" and "needs::job" directives. This is a bit tricky,
and is best described by the Gitlab-CI documentation [0].
We also list those .config files to generate the actual list of jobs to
run in the child pipeline.
Notes:
- if the user provides an empty fragment, this is considered an error:
indeed, without a fragment (and the package name), there is no way
to know what to test;
- if that fragment yields an empty list of tests, then there is
nothing to test either, so that is also considered an error.
[0] https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/README.html#artifact-downloads-to-child-pipelines
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
[yann.morin.1998@free.fr:
- split the change to test-pkg to its own patch
- generate the actual yml snippet in support/scripts/generate-gitlab-ci-yml,
listing the .config files created by test-pkg
- some code-style-candies...
]
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
2021-08-21 15:46:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if [ -n "${do_testpkg}" ]; then
|
|
|
|
printf '%s: { extends: .test_pkg }\n' "${do_testpkg[@]}"
|
|
|
|
fi
|
2020-09-06 22:12:24 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-06 22:12:20 +02:00
|
|
|
main "${@}"
|