NetCube-Systems-Austria/kumquat-buildroot
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
74235a6854
kumquat-buildroot/package/a10disp/Config.in

14 lines
360 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

a10disp: new package Signed-off-by: Spenser Gilliland <spenser@gillilanding.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2013-07-20 01:37:51 +02:00
config BR2_PACKAGE_A10DISP
bool "a10disp"
depends on BR2_arm
depends on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL
help
package/a*/Config.in: fix help text wrapping The check-package script when ran gives warnings on text wrapping on all of these Config files. This patch cleans up all warnings related to the text wrapping for the Config files starting with the letter a in the package directory. The appropriate indentation is: <tab><2 spaces><62 chars> See http://nightly.buildroot.org/#writing-rules-config-in for more information. Signed-off-by: Adam Duskett <aduskett@codeblue.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2017-05-05 16:08:05 +02:00
Program to change the display mode of Allwinner ARM SOCs
running the linux-sunxi kernel (and not the mainline kernel.)
a10disp: new package Signed-off-by: Spenser Gilliland <spenser@gillilanding.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2013-07-20 01:37:51 +02:00
http://github.com/hglm/a10disp
Config.in files: unification of comments about dependency on Linux kernel This patch lines up the comments of packages that need a Linux kernel to be built by buildroot, to the format: foo needs a Linux kernel to be built Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2013-12-15 13:20:39 +01:00
comment "a10disp needs a Linux kernel to be built"
Config.in files: add missing dependencies to toolchain option comments When a package A depends on config option B and toolchain option C, then the comment that is given when C is not fulfilled should also depend on B. For example: config BR2_PACKAGE_A depends on BR2_B depends on BR2_LARGEFILE depends on BR2_WCHAR comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR This comment should actually be: comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on BR2_B depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR or if possible (typically when B is a package config option declared in that same Config.in file): if BR2_B comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR [other config options depending on B] endif Otherwise, the comment would be visible even though the other dependencies are not met. This patch adds such missing dependencies, and changes existing such dependencies from depends on BR2_BASE_DEP && !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC to depends on BR2_BASE_DEP depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC so that (positive) base dependencies are separate from the (negative) toolchain dependencies. This strategy makes it easier to write such comments (because one can simply copy the base dependency from the actual package config option), but also avoids complex and long boolean expressions. Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> (untested) Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2013-11-07 09:24:37 +01:00
depends on BR2_arm
depends on !BR2_LINUX_KERNEL
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink