NetCube-Systems-Austria/kumquat-buildroot
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
5d23c700e2
kumquat-buildroot/fs/iso9660/Config.in

18 lines
473 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

patch from janlana adding an x86 bootable iso9660 CD-ROM target
2006-04-06 20:31:14 +02:00
config BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660
bool "iso image"
iso9660: take into account the linux changes Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2010-04-03 18:55:43 +02:00
depends on (BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64)
depends on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL
iso9660 fs: use cpio initrd instead of ext2 The ext2 initrd is pretty broken, because it requires an additional root=/dev/ram0 command line parameter, and a /init to mount devtmps that isn't there in out ext2 rootfs. So just use a cpio instead. Note that there is no check if the kernel supports initramfs or the selected compression method. Also removed a bit of dead code in iso9660.mk. Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2012-11-09 14:54:09 +01:00
select BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_CPIO
GRUB package is called BR2_TARGET_GRUB
2006-09-25 14:35:27 +02:00
select BR2_TARGET_GRUB
patch from janlana adding an x86 bootable iso9660 CD-ROM target
2006-04-06 20:31:14 +02:00
help
Build a bootable iso9660 image
config BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660_BOOT_MENU
string "Boot menu.lst file"
depends on BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660
iso9660: menu.lst fixup after move to fs Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2010-04-15 13:51:33 +02:00
default "fs/iso9660/menu.lst"
target/iso9660: needs a linux kernel Closes #403. Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2009-07-27 00:05:14 +02:00
Config.in files: unification of comments about dependency on Linux kernel This patch lines up the comments of packages that need a Linux kernel to be built by buildroot, to the format: foo needs a Linux kernel to be built Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2013-12-15 13:20:39 +01:00
comment "iso image needs a Linux kernel to be built"
Config.in files: add missing dependencies to toolchain option comments When a package A depends on config option B and toolchain option C, then the comment that is given when C is not fulfilled should also depend on B. For example: config BR2_PACKAGE_A depends on BR2_B depends on BR2_LARGEFILE depends on BR2_WCHAR comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR This comment should actually be: comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on BR2_B depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR or if possible (typically when B is a package config option declared in that same Config.in file): if BR2_B comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE || !BR2_WCHAR [other config options depending on B] endif Otherwise, the comment would be visible even though the other dependencies are not met. This patch adds such missing dependencies, and changes existing such dependencies from depends on BR2_BASE_DEP && !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC to depends on BR2_BASE_DEP depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC so that (positive) base dependencies are separate from the (negative) toolchain dependencies. This strategy makes it easier to write such comments (because one can simply copy the base dependency from the actual package config option), but also avoids complex and long boolean expressions. Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> (untested) Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2013-11-07 09:24:37 +01:00
depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64
depends on !BR2_LINUX_KERNEL
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink