kumquat-buildroot/package/libopenssl/libopenssl.hash

# From https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.2p.tar.gz.sha256
sha256	50a98e07b1a89eb8f6a99477f262df71c6fa7bef77df4dc83025a2845c827d00	openssl-1.0.2p.tar.gz
# From https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.2p.tar.gz.sha1
sha1	f34b5322e92415755c7d58bf5d0d5cf37666382c				openssl-1.0.2p.tar.gz
# Locally computed
sha256	eddd8a5123748052c598214487ac178e4bfa4e31ba2ec520c70d59c8c5bfa2e9	openssl-1.0.2a-parallel-install-dirs.patch?id=c8abcbe8de5d3b6cdd68c162f398c011ff6e2d9d
sha256	147c3eeaad614c044749ea527cb433eae5e2d5cad34a78c6ba61cd967bfbe01f	openssl-1.0.2a-parallel-obj-headers.patch?id=c8abcbe8de5d3b6cdd68c162f398c011ff6e2d9d
sha256	30cb49489de5041841a74da9155cd4fabfbce33237262ba7cd23974314ae2956	openssl-1.0.2a-parallel-symlinking.patch?id=c8abcbe8de5d3b6cdd68c162f398c011ff6e2d9d
sha256	deaf6f3af41874ecc6d63841ea14b8e6c71cea81d4a511a754bc90c9a993147f	openssl-1.0.2d-parallel-build.patch?id=c8abcbe8de5d3b6cdd68c162f398c011ff6e2d9d
sha256	c8f60f4842bbad0353f5d81620e72b168b5638ca3a0a999f5da113b22491612e	LICENSE
package/libopenssl: security bump to version 1.0.2p Fixes CVE-2018-0732 & CVE-2018-0737: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html Added upstream sha1 hash. Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> 2018-08-17 07:32:07 +02:00			`# From https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.2p.tar.gz.sha256`
			`sha256 50a98e07b1a89eb8f6a99477f262df71c6fa7bef77df4dc83025a2845c827d00 openssl-1.0.2p.tar.gz`
			`# From https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.2p.tar.gz.sha1`
			`sha1 f34b5322e92415755c7d58bf5d0d5cf37666382c openssl-1.0.2p.tar.gz`
openssl: re-enable parallel build The previous incarnation was incomplete, it only applied one of the Gentoo patches, hence it had corner cases. Apply all 4 patches as pointed out by Mike on the mailing list. Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo.zacarias@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> 2015-12-03 22:31:16 +01:00			`# Locally computed`
			`sha256 eddd8a5123748052c598214487ac178e4bfa4e31ba2ec520c70d59c8c5bfa2e9 openssl-1.0.2a-parallel-install-dirs.patch?id=c8abcbe8de5d3b6cdd68c162f398c011ff6e2d9d`
			`sha256 147c3eeaad614c044749ea527cb433eae5e2d5cad34a78c6ba61cd967bfbe01f openssl-1.0.2a-parallel-obj-headers.patch?id=c8abcbe8de5d3b6cdd68c162f398c011ff6e2d9d`
			`sha256 30cb49489de5041841a74da9155cd4fabfbce33237262ba7cd23974314ae2956 openssl-1.0.2a-parallel-symlinking.patch?id=c8abcbe8de5d3b6cdd68c162f398c011ff6e2d9d`
			`sha256 deaf6f3af41874ecc6d63841ea14b8e6c71cea81d4a511a754bc90c9a993147f openssl-1.0.2d-parallel-build.patch?id=c8abcbe8de5d3b6cdd68c162f398c011ff6e2d9d`
libopenssl: security bump to version 1.0.2o Fixes the following security issues: Constructed ASN.1 types with a recursive definition could exceed the stack (CVE-2018-0739) Constructed ASN.1 types with a recursive definition (such as can be found in PKCS7) could eventually exceed the stack given malicious input with excessive recursion. This could result in a Denial Of Service attack. There are no such structures used within SSL/TLS that come from untrusted sources so this is considered safe. Incorrect CRYPTO_memcmp on HP-UX PA-RISC (CVE-2018-0733) Because of an implementation bug the PA-RISC CRYPTO_memcmp function is effectively reduced to only comparing the least significant bit of each byte. This allows an attacker to forge messages that would be considered as authenticated in an amount of tries lower than that guaranteed by the security claims of the scheme. The module can only be compiled by the HP-UX assembler, so that only HP-UX PA-RISC targets are affected. rsaz_1024_mul_avx2 overflow bug on x86_64 (CVE-2017-3738) This issue has been reported in a previous OpenSSL security advisory and a fix was provided for OpenSSL 1.0.2. Due to the low severity no fix was released at that time for OpenSSL 1.1.0. The fix is now available in OpenSSL 1.1.0h. There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). For more details, see https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20180327.txt The copyright year changed in LICENSE, so adjust the hash to match. Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> 2018-03-29 16:52:09 +02:00			`sha256 c8f60f4842bbad0353f5d81620e72b168b5638ca3a0a999f5da113b22491612e LICENSE`