kumquat-buildroot/package/arp-scan/0001-configure-try-linking-to-detect-stack-protector-supp.patch

40 lines
1.3 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

From f406041b58eadc716d6227408d3af553d566ffeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)" <arnout@mind.be>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 17:31:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] configure: try linking to detect stack-protector support
Even if gcc accepts the -fstack-protector argument, it is possible that
the libssp support library is missing. Detect this by linking instead
of just compiling.
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
---
acinclude.m4 | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4
index 3c84118..4725154 100644
--- a/acinclude.m4
+++ b/acinclude.m4
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([GCC_STACK_PROTECT_CC],[
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether ${CC} accepts -fstack-protector])
ssp_old_cflags="$CFLAGS"
CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fstack-protector"
- AC_TRY_COMPILE(,,, ssp_cc=no)
+ AC_TRY_LINK(,,, ssp_cc=no)
echo $ssp_cc
if test "X$ssp_cc" = "Xno"; then
CFLAGS="$ssp_old_cflags"
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([GCC_STACK_PROTECT_CXX],[
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether ${CXX} accepts -fstack-protector])
ssp_old_cxxflags="$CXXFLAGS"
CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -fstack-protector"
- AC_TRY_COMPILE(,,, ssp_cxx=no)
+ AC_TRY_LINK(,,, ssp_cxx=no)
echo $ssp_cxx
if test "X$ssp_cxx" = "Xno"; then
CXXFLAGS="$ssp_old_cxxflags"
--
2.11.0