kumquat-buildroot/fs/iso9660/Config.in

config BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660
	bool "iso image"
	depends on (BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64)
	depends on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL
	select BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_CPIO
	select BR2_TARGET_GRUB
	select BR2_TARGET_GRUB_FS_ISO9660
	help
	  Build a bootable iso9660 image

config BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660_BOOT_MENU
	string "Boot menu.lst file"
	depends on BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660
	default "fs/iso9660/menu.lst"

comment "iso image needs a Linux kernel to be built"
	depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64
	depends on !BR2_LINUX_KERNEL
patch from janlana adding an x86 bootable iso9660 CD-ROM target 2006-04-06 20:31:14 +02:00			`config BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660`
			`bool "iso image"`
iso9660: take into account the linux changes Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> 2010-04-03 18:55:43 +02:00			`depends on (BR2_i386 \|\| BR2_x86_64)`
			`depends on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL`
iso9660 fs: use cpio initrd instead of ext2 The ext2 initrd is pretty broken, because it requires an additional root=/dev/ram0 command line parameter, and a /init to mount devtmps that isn't there in out ext2 rootfs. So just use a cpio instead. Note that there is no check if the kernel supports initramfs or the selected compression method. Also removed a bit of dead code in iso9660.mk. Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk> 2012-11-09 14:54:09 +01:00			`select BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_CPIO`
GRUB package is called BR2_TARGET_GRUB 2006-09-25 14:35:27 +02:00			`select BR2_TARGET_GRUB`
fs/iso9660: select ISO9660 support in Grub The fs/iso9660 logic assumes that the Grub bootloader is used. Therefore, it should make sure that Grub is configured with the support for the ISO9660 filesystem. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> 2013-12-28 15:56:35 +01:00			`select BR2_TARGET_GRUB_FS_ISO9660`
patch from janlana adding an x86 bootable iso9660 CD-ROM target 2006-04-06 20:31:14 +02:00			`help`
			`Build a bootable iso9660 image`

			`config BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660_BOOT_MENU`
			`string "Boot menu.lst file"`
			`depends on BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660`
iso9660: menu.lst fixup after move to fs Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk> 2010-04-15 13:51:33 +02:00			`default "fs/iso9660/menu.lst"`
target/iso9660: needs a linux kernel Closes #403. Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk> 2009-07-27 00:05:14 +02:00
Config.in files: unification of comments about dependency on Linux kernel This patch lines up the comments of packages that need a Linux kernel to be built by buildroot, to the format: foo needs a Linux kernel to be built Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> 2013-12-15 13:20:39 +01:00			`comment "iso image needs a Linux kernel to be built"`
Config.in files: add missing dependencies to toolchain option comments When a package A depends on config option B and toolchain option C, then the comment that is given when C is not fulfilled should also depend on B. For example: config BR2_PACKAGE_A depends on BR2_B depends on BR2_LARGEFILE depends on BR2_WCHAR comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE \|\| !BR2_WCHAR This comment should actually be: comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on BR2_B depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE \|\| !BR2_WCHAR or if possible (typically when B is a package config option declared in that same Config.in file): if BR2_B comment "A needs a toolchain w/ largefile, wchar" depends on !BR2_LARGEFILE \|\| !BR2_WCHAR [other config options depending on B] endif Otherwise, the comment would be visible even though the other dependencies are not met. This patch adds such missing dependencies, and changes existing such dependencies from depends on BR2_BASE_DEP && !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC to depends on BR2_BASE_DEP depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC so that (positive) base dependencies are separate from the (negative) toolchain dependencies. This strategy makes it easier to write such comments (because one can simply copy the base dependency from the actual package config option), but also avoids complex and long boolean expressions. Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> (untested) Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> 2013-11-07 09:24:37 +01:00			`depends on BR2_i386 \|\| BR2_x86_64`
			`depends on !BR2_LINUX_KERNEL`