kumquat-buildroot/toolchain/toolchain-common.in

470 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

# Generic toolchain options
# we want gdb config in the middle of both source and external
# toolchains, but mconf won't let us source the same file twice,
# so put it here instead
gdb: convert to the package infrastructure This commit converts gdb to the package infrastructure, and therefore moves it from toolchain/gdb to package/gdb. The target package is now visible in "Package selection for the target" => "Debugging, profiling and benchmark". The main option, "gdb", forcefully selects the "gdbserver" sub-option by default. Another sub-option, "full debugger" allows to install the complete gdb on the target. When this option is enabled, then "gdbserver" is no longer forcefully selected. This ensures that at least gdbserver or the full debugger gets built/installed, so that the package is not a no-op. The host debugger is still enabled through a configuration option in "Toolchain". It is now visible regardless of the toolchain type (it used to be hidden for External Toolchains). The configuration options relative to the host debugger are now in package/gdb/Config.in.host, similar to how we have package/binutils/Config.in.host. Since gdb is now a proper package, it is no longer allowed to 'select BR2_PTHREADS_DEBUG' to ensure thread debugging is available when needed. Instead, it now 'depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_DEBUG'. This option, in turn, is selected by the different toolchain backends when appropriate. The 'BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_DEBUG_IF_NEEDED' option is removed, since we no longer need to know when it is allowed to 'select BR2_PTHREADS_DEBUG'. Also, the 'BR2_PTHREADS_DEBUG' option is moved to appear right below the thread implementation selection (in the case of the Buildroot toolchain backend). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
2013-04-07 02:04:33 +02:00
source "package/gdb/Config.in.host"
comment "Toolchain Generic Options"
# https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19615
# Affect toolchains built with binutils 2.26 (fixed in binutils 2.26.1).
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_BINUTILS_BUG_19615
bool
# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
# exception_ptr, nested_exception, and future from libstdc++ are not
# available for architectures not supporting always lock-free atomic
# ints before GCC 7
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_GCC_BUG_64735
bool
default y if BR2_nios2
default y if BR2_ARM_CPU_ARMV4
default y if BR2_ARM_CPU_ARMV5
default y if BR2_sparc_v8
default y if BR2_m68k_cf5208
depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_NATIVE_RPC
bool
config BR2_USE_WCHAR
bool
config BR2_ENABLE_LOCALE
bool
config BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP
bool
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_FORTRAN
bool
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS
bool
2011-11-24 14:26:52 +01:00
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_DEBUG
bool
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_NPTL
bool
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SHADOW_PASSWORDS
bool
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SSP
bool
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORTS_PIE
bool
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GLIBC_GCONV_LIBS_COPY
bool "Copy gconv libraries"
depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
help
The gconv libraries are used to convert between different
character sets (charsets).
Say 'y' if you need to store and/or display different charsets.
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GLIBC_GCONV_LIBS_LIST
string "Gconv libraries to copy"
depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GLIBC_GCONV_LIBS_COPY
help
Set to the list of gconv libraries to copy.
Leave empty to copy all gconv libraries.
Specify only the basename of the libraries, leave
out the .so extension. Eg.:
IBM850 ISO8859-15 UNICODE
Note: the full set of gconv libs are ~8MiB (on ARM).
# This boolean is true if the toolchain provides a built-in full
# featured gettext implementation (glibc), and false if only a stub
# gettext implementation is provided (uclibc, musl)
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_FULL_GETTEXT
bool
config BR2_USE_MMU
bool "Enable MMU support" if BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL
default y if BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_OPTIONAL || BR2_ARCH_HAS_MMU_MANDATORY
help
If your target has a MMU, you should say Y here. If you
are unsure, just say Y.
config BR2_TARGET_OPTIMIZATION
string "Target Optimizations"
toolchain: get rid of -pipe from optimisations -pipe is causing some build failures in Linux kernel >= 3.17. Also, nowadays, using -pipe does not gain as much as it used to back in the days: Measurements made with a 3.16.7 Linux kernel: make linux-depends time sh -c 'make linux-build >/dev/null 2>&1' Without -pipe: 716.32user 54.44system 3:42.12elapsed 346%CPU 721.22user 54.47system 3:41.81elapsed 349%CPU 722.44user 54.00system 3:42.13elapsed 349%CPU 721.03user 53.81system 3:41.92elapsed 349%CPU 713.21user 53.63system 3:40.51elapsed 347%CPU 706.67user 52.42system 3:38.40elapsed 347%CPU 714.40user 53.18system 3:40.16elapsed 348%CPU 706.01user 53.09system 3:37.87elapsed 348%CPU 705.98user 53.01system 3:38.03elapsed 348%CPU 714.17user 53.55system 3:39.98elapsed 348%CPU Average: 3:40.29elapsed With -pipe: 720.13user 53.90system 3:41.98elapsed 348%CPU 713.38user 53.69system 3:40.44elapsed 347%CPU 711.60user 52.81system 3:39.06elapsed 348%CPU 708.66user 53.09system 3:38.59elapsed 348%CPU 711.76user 53.00system 3:38.48elapsed 350%CPU 717.85user 53.97system 3:41.77elapsed 348%CPU 716.77user 53.77system 3:40.91elapsed 348%CPU 717.48user 53.65system 3:41.24elapsed 348%CPU 721.44user 55.67system 3:43.45elapsed 347%CPU 724.61user 55.63system 3:43.35elapsed 349%CPU Average: 3:40.93elapsed The delta is well in the measurement noise. Just get rid of it. Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@openwide.fr> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2014-12-21 14:00:25 +01:00
default ""
help
Optimizations to use when building for the target host.
NOTE: gcc optimization level is defined in build options.
config BR2_TARGET_LDFLAGS
string "Target linker options"
help
Extra options to pass to the linker when building for the target.
Note that options with a '$' sign (eg. -Wl,-rpath='$ORIGIN/../lib')
are not supported.
config BR2_ECLIPSE_REGISTER
bool "Register toolchain within Eclipse Buildroot plug-in"
help
This options tells Buildroot to generate the necessary
configuration files to make your toolchain appear within
Eclipse, through the Eclipse Buildroot plugin.
# Options for packages to depend on, if they require at least a
# specific version of the kernel headers.
# Toolchains should choose the adequate option (ie. the highest
# version, not all of them).
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_0
bool
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_1
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_0
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_2
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_1
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_3
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_2
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_4
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_3
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_5
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_4
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_6
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_5
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_7
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_6
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_8
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_7
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_9
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_8
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_10
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_9
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_11
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_10
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_12
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_11
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_13
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_12
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_14
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_13
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_15
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_14
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_16
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_15
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_17
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_16
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_18
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_17
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_19
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_18
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_0
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_19
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_1
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_0
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_2
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_1
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_3
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_2
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_4
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_3
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_5
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_4
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_6
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_5
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_7
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_6
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_8
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_7
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_9
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_8
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_10
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_9
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_11
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_10
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_12
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_11
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_13
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_12
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_14
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_13
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_15
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_14
# This order guarantees that the highest version is set, as kconfig
# stops affecting a value on the first matching default.
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST
string
default "4.15" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_15
default "4.14" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_14
default "4.13" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_13
default "4.12" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_12
default "4.11" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_11
default "4.10" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_10
default "4.9" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_9
default "4.8" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_8
default "4.7" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_7
default "4.6" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_6
default "4.5" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_5
default "4.4" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_4
default "4.3" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_3
default "4.2" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_2
default "4.1" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_1
default "4.0" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_4_0
default "3.19" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_19
default "3.18" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_18
default "3.17" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_17
default "3.16" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_16
default "3.15" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_15
default "3.14" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_14
default "3.13" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_13
default "3.12" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_12
default "3.11" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_11
default "3.10" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_10
default "3.9" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_9
default "3.8" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_8
default "3.7" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_7
default "3.6" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_6
default "3.5" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_5
default "3.4" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_4
default "3.3" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_3
default "3.2" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_2
default "3.1" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_1
default "3.0" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_3_0
default "2.6"
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_3
bool
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_4
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_3
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_5
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_4
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_6
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_5
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_6
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_5
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9
gcc: add support for gcc 6 This commit adds the support for gcc 6. This release allows to remove a large number of our gcc patches, mainly thanks to the Xtensa and musl related patches being merged upstream. Patches kept with no changes: 100-uclibc-conf.patch 301-missing-execinfo_h.patch 810-arm-softfloat-libgcc.patch 830-arm_unbreak_armv4t.patch 840-microblaze-enable-dwarf-eh-support.patch 860-cilk-wchar.patch 890-fix-m68k-compile.patch Patches dropped because they have been merged upstream, or were already upstream backports: 120-gcc-config.gcc-fix-typo-for-powerpc-e6500-cpu_is_64b.patch (merged) 850-libstdcxx-uclibc-c99.patch (merged in a different form, see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58393) 870-xtensa-add-mauto-litpools-option.patch (upstream backport) 871-xtensa-reimplement-register-spilling.patch (upstream backport) 872-xtensa-use-unwind-dw2-fde-dip-instead-of-unwind-dw2-.patch (upstream backport) 873-xtensa-fix-_Unwind_GetCFA.patch (upstream backport) 874-xtensa-add-uclinux-support.patch (upstream backport) 900-libitm-fixes-for-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) 901-fixincludes-update-for-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) 902-unwind-fix-for-musl.patch (upstream backport) 903-libstdc++-libgfortran-gthr-workaround-for-musl.patch (upstream backport) 904-musl-libc-config.patch (upstream backport) 905-add-musl-support-to-gcc.patch (upstream backport) 905-add-musl-support-to-gcc.patch (upstream backport) 906-mips-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) 907-x86-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) 908-arm-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) 909-aarch64-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) Successfully build-time and run-time tested with qemu_arm_vexpress_defconfig, using gcc 6.x, both in uClibc and musl configurations. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2016-04-27 15:54:03 +02:00
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_6
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_5
package/gcc: add support for gcc 7 Remove upstream patches: 831-ARM-PR-target-70473-Reduce-size-of-Cortex-A8-automat.patch 870-xtensa-Fix-PR-target-78118.patch 871-xtensa-Fix-PR-target-78603.patch 890-fix-m68k-compile.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/1701058da920d27de87dc82e8d327b8ca930e997 892-libgcc-mkmap-symver-support-skip_underscore.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/6c8f362e1f17cce05131eb8ff53963d64bc69484 893-libgcc-config-bfin-use-the-generic-linker-version-in.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/966d046c08ba50fc988ac614f84f2d49c1546e28 894-libgcc-fix-DWARF-compilation-with-FDPIC-targets.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/397d0e43abb943f1fe57801220e7e46bc6636c7c 895-bfin-define-REENTRANT.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/da89a4dcdf75bc3134f73520535c949bbbb0c845 940-uclinux-enable-threads.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/b9ce54109ec78d18f6123a1e54aae1293bede716 941-mips-Add-support-for-mips-r6-musl.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/83717065090bb8b954556d1216dd9dc397dc0243 Remove obsolete patches: 301-missing-execinfo_h.patch: boehm-gc removed from gcc sources: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/baf71228766058f5541d929891237d394376c975 830-arm_unbreak_armv4t.patch: SUBTARGET_CPU_DEFAULT removed: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/ff3caa3ade14a42d5ab7e81cbd3605fe15aa998d Add a new patch to allow to build gcc 7.1 without extracting gcc/testsuite directory. This new gcc version require a kernel patch [1] to avoid a build issue with ____ilog2_NaN symbol. The following kernel version contain contain already this patch : 4.11, 4.10.6, 4.9.18, 4.4.57, 3.18.50 and 3.12.73. To build a toolchain based on gcc 7 and uClibc-ng 1.0.24, the patch [2] is required to avoid a build issue due to missing aligned_alloc() definition. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=474c90156c8dcc2fa815e6716cc9394d7930cb9c [2] https://cgit.openadk.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/commit/?id=5b0f49037e8ea8500b05c8f31ee88529ccac4cee Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com> Tested-by: Theodore Ateba <tf.ateba@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Cc: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2017-05-23 22:24:39 +02:00
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7
bool
select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_6
# This order guarantees that the highest version is set, as kconfig
# stops affecting a value on the first matching default.
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST
string
package/gcc: add support for gcc 7 Remove upstream patches: 831-ARM-PR-target-70473-Reduce-size-of-Cortex-A8-automat.patch 870-xtensa-Fix-PR-target-78118.patch 871-xtensa-Fix-PR-target-78603.patch 890-fix-m68k-compile.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/1701058da920d27de87dc82e8d327b8ca930e997 892-libgcc-mkmap-symver-support-skip_underscore.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/6c8f362e1f17cce05131eb8ff53963d64bc69484 893-libgcc-config-bfin-use-the-generic-linker-version-in.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/966d046c08ba50fc988ac614f84f2d49c1546e28 894-libgcc-fix-DWARF-compilation-with-FDPIC-targets.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/397d0e43abb943f1fe57801220e7e46bc6636c7c 895-bfin-define-REENTRANT.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/da89a4dcdf75bc3134f73520535c949bbbb0c845 940-uclinux-enable-threads.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/b9ce54109ec78d18f6123a1e54aae1293bede716 941-mips-Add-support-for-mips-r6-musl.patch: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/83717065090bb8b954556d1216dd9dc397dc0243 Remove obsolete patches: 301-missing-execinfo_h.patch: boehm-gc removed from gcc sources: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/baf71228766058f5541d929891237d394376c975 830-arm_unbreak_armv4t.patch: SUBTARGET_CPU_DEFAULT removed: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/ff3caa3ade14a42d5ab7e81cbd3605fe15aa998d Add a new patch to allow to build gcc 7.1 without extracting gcc/testsuite directory. This new gcc version require a kernel patch [1] to avoid a build issue with ____ilog2_NaN symbol. The following kernel version contain contain already this patch : 4.11, 4.10.6, 4.9.18, 4.4.57, 3.18.50 and 3.12.73. To build a toolchain based on gcc 7 and uClibc-ng 1.0.24, the patch [2] is required to avoid a build issue due to missing aligned_alloc() definition. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=474c90156c8dcc2fa815e6716cc9394d7930cb9c [2] https://cgit.openadk.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/commit/?id=5b0f49037e8ea8500b05c8f31ee88529ccac4cee Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com> Tested-by: Theodore Ateba <tf.ateba@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Cc: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2017-05-23 22:24:39 +02:00
default "7" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7
gcc: add support for gcc 6 This commit adds the support for gcc 6. This release allows to remove a large number of our gcc patches, mainly thanks to the Xtensa and musl related patches being merged upstream. Patches kept with no changes: 100-uclibc-conf.patch 301-missing-execinfo_h.patch 810-arm-softfloat-libgcc.patch 830-arm_unbreak_armv4t.patch 840-microblaze-enable-dwarf-eh-support.patch 860-cilk-wchar.patch 890-fix-m68k-compile.patch Patches dropped because they have been merged upstream, or were already upstream backports: 120-gcc-config.gcc-fix-typo-for-powerpc-e6500-cpu_is_64b.patch (merged) 850-libstdcxx-uclibc-c99.patch (merged in a different form, see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58393) 870-xtensa-add-mauto-litpools-option.patch (upstream backport) 871-xtensa-reimplement-register-spilling.patch (upstream backport) 872-xtensa-use-unwind-dw2-fde-dip-instead-of-unwind-dw2-.patch (upstream backport) 873-xtensa-fix-_Unwind_GetCFA.patch (upstream backport) 874-xtensa-add-uclinux-support.patch (upstream backport) 900-libitm-fixes-for-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) 901-fixincludes-update-for-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) 902-unwind-fix-for-musl.patch (upstream backport) 903-libstdc++-libgfortran-gthr-workaround-for-musl.patch (upstream backport) 904-musl-libc-config.patch (upstream backport) 905-add-musl-support-to-gcc.patch (upstream backport) 905-add-musl-support-to-gcc.patch (upstream backport) 906-mips-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) 907-x86-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) 908-arm-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) 909-aarch64-musl-support.patch (upstream backport) Successfully build-time and run-time tested with qemu_arm_vexpress_defconfig, using gcc 6.x, both in uClibc and musl configurations. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
2016-04-27 15:54:03 +02:00
default "6" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_6
default "5" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_5
default "4.9" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9
default "4.8" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8
default "4.7" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7
default "4.6" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_6
default "4.5" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_5
default "4.4" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_4
default "4.3" if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_3
toolchain: add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_{SYNC_x, ATOMIC} hidden booleans Currently, Buildroot provides one BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS boolean option to indicate whether the architecture supports atomic operations or not. However, the reality of atomic operations support is much more complicated and requires more than one option to be expressed properly. There are in fact two types of atomic built-ins provided by gcc: (1) The __sync_*() family of functions, which have been in gcc for a long time (probably gcc 4.1). They are available in variants operating on 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte integers. Some architectures implement a number of variants, some do not implement any, some implement all of them. They are now considered "legacy" by the gcc developers but are nonetheless still being used by a significant number of userspace libraries and applications. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html (2) The __atomic_*() family of functions, which have been introduced in gcc 4.7. They have been introduced in order to support C++11 atomic operations. In gcc 4.8, they are available on all architectures, either built-in or in the libatomic library part of the gcc runtime (in which case the application needs to be linked with -latomic). In gcc 4.7, the __atomic_*() intrinsics are only supported on certain architectures, since libatomic did not exist at the time. For (1), a single BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS is not sufficient, because depending on the architecture, some variants may or may not be available. Setting BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to false as soon as one of the variant is missing would cause a large number of packages to become unavailable, even if they in fact use only more common variants available on a large number of architectures. For this reason, we've chosen to introduce four new Config.in options: - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_1 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_2 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_3 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_4 Which indicate whether the toolchain support 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte __sync_*() built-ins respectively. For (2), we introduce a BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC, which indicates if the __atomic_*() built-ins are available. Note that it is up to the package to link with -latomic when gcc is >= 4.8. Since __atomic_*() intrinsics for all sizes are supported starting We conducted a fairly large analysis about various architectures supported by Buildroot, as well as with a number of different toolchains, to check which combinations support which variant. To do, we linked the following program with various toolchains: int main(void) { uint8_t a; uint16_t b; uint32_t c; uint64_t d; __sync_fetch_and_add(&a, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&b, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&c, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&d, 3); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&a, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&b, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&c, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&d, 1, 2); __atomic_add_fetch(&a, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&b, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&c, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&d, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&a, &a, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&b, &b, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&c, &c, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&d, &d, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); return 0; } And looked at which symbols were unresolved. For the __atomic_*() ones, we tested with and without -latomic to see which variants are built-in, which variants require libatomic. This testing effort has led to the following results: __sync __atomic gcc 1 2 4 8 1 2 4 8 ARC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.8 [with BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARC - - - - L L L L 4.8 [without BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARM Y Y Y X Y Y Y Y 4.8, 4.7 ARM Y Y Y - 4.5 AArch64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9, 5.1 Bfin - - Y - 4.3 i386 (i386) - - - - L L L L 4.9 i386 (i486..) Y Y Y - L L L L 4.9 [i486, c3, winchip2, winchip-c6] i386 (> i586) Y Y Y Y L L L L 4.9 Microblaze - - Y - L L Y L 4.9 MIPS Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 MIPS64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 NIOS 2 Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9, 5.2 PowerPC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SuperH Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SPARC - - - - L L L L 4.9 SPARC64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 x86_64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.7, 4.9 Xtensa Y Y Y - Y Y Y Y 4.9 Notes: * __atomic built-ins appeared in gcc 4.7, so for toolchais older than that, the __atomic column is empty. * Y means 'supported built-in' * L means 'supported via linking to libatomic' (only for __atomic functions) * X indicates a very special case for 8 bytes __sync built-ins on ARM. On ARMv7, there is no problem, starting from gcc 4.7, the __sync built-in for 8 bytes integers is implemented, fully in userspace. For cores < ARMv7, doing a 8 bytes atomic operation requires help from the kernel. Unfortunately, the libgcc code implementing this uses the __write() function to display an error, and this function is internal to glibc. Therefore, if you're using glibc everything is fine, but if you're using uClibc or musl, you cannot link an application that uses 8 bytes __sync operations. This has been fixed as part of gcc PR68095, merged in the gcc 5 branch but not yet part of any gcc release. * - means not supported This commit only introduces the new options. Follow-up commits will progressively change the packages using BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to use the appropriate BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_x or BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC until the point where BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS can be removed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2016-02-02 16:31:20 +01:00
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_MNAN_OPTION
bool
default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9
toolchain: add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_{SYNC_x, ATOMIC} hidden booleans Currently, Buildroot provides one BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS boolean option to indicate whether the architecture supports atomic operations or not. However, the reality of atomic operations support is much more complicated and requires more than one option to be expressed properly. There are in fact two types of atomic built-ins provided by gcc: (1) The __sync_*() family of functions, which have been in gcc for a long time (probably gcc 4.1). They are available in variants operating on 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte integers. Some architectures implement a number of variants, some do not implement any, some implement all of them. They are now considered "legacy" by the gcc developers but are nonetheless still being used by a significant number of userspace libraries and applications. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html (2) The __atomic_*() family of functions, which have been introduced in gcc 4.7. They have been introduced in order to support C++11 atomic operations. In gcc 4.8, they are available on all architectures, either built-in or in the libatomic library part of the gcc runtime (in which case the application needs to be linked with -latomic). In gcc 4.7, the __atomic_*() intrinsics are only supported on certain architectures, since libatomic did not exist at the time. For (1), a single BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS is not sufficient, because depending on the architecture, some variants may or may not be available. Setting BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to false as soon as one of the variant is missing would cause a large number of packages to become unavailable, even if they in fact use only more common variants available on a large number of architectures. For this reason, we've chosen to introduce four new Config.in options: - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_1 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_2 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_3 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_4 Which indicate whether the toolchain support 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte __sync_*() built-ins respectively. For (2), we introduce a BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC, which indicates if the __atomic_*() built-ins are available. Note that it is up to the package to link with -latomic when gcc is >= 4.8. Since __atomic_*() intrinsics for all sizes are supported starting We conducted a fairly large analysis about various architectures supported by Buildroot, as well as with a number of different toolchains, to check which combinations support which variant. To do, we linked the following program with various toolchains: int main(void) { uint8_t a; uint16_t b; uint32_t c; uint64_t d; __sync_fetch_and_add(&a, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&b, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&c, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&d, 3); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&a, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&b, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&c, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&d, 1, 2); __atomic_add_fetch(&a, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&b, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&c, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&d, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&a, &a, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&b, &b, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&c, &c, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&d, &d, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); return 0; } And looked at which symbols were unresolved. For the __atomic_*() ones, we tested with and without -latomic to see which variants are built-in, which variants require libatomic. This testing effort has led to the following results: __sync __atomic gcc 1 2 4 8 1 2 4 8 ARC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.8 [with BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARC - - - - L L L L 4.8 [without BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARM Y Y Y X Y Y Y Y 4.8, 4.7 ARM Y Y Y - 4.5 AArch64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9, 5.1 Bfin - - Y - 4.3 i386 (i386) - - - - L L L L 4.9 i386 (i486..) Y Y Y - L L L L 4.9 [i486, c3, winchip2, winchip-c6] i386 (> i586) Y Y Y Y L L L L 4.9 Microblaze - - Y - L L Y L 4.9 MIPS Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 MIPS64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 NIOS 2 Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9, 5.2 PowerPC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SuperH Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SPARC - - - - L L L L 4.9 SPARC64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 x86_64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.7, 4.9 Xtensa Y Y Y - Y Y Y Y 4.9 Notes: * __atomic built-ins appeared in gcc 4.7, so for toolchais older than that, the __atomic column is empty. * Y means 'supported built-in' * L means 'supported via linking to libatomic' (only for __atomic functions) * X indicates a very special case for 8 bytes __sync built-ins on ARM. On ARMv7, there is no problem, starting from gcc 4.7, the __sync built-in for 8 bytes integers is implemented, fully in userspace. For cores < ARMv7, doing a 8 bytes atomic operation requires help from the kernel. Unfortunately, the libgcc code implementing this uses the __write() function to display an error, and this function is internal to glibc. Therefore, if you're using glibc everything is fine, but if you're using uClibc or musl, you cannot link an application that uses 8 bytes __sync operations. This has been fixed as part of gcc PR68095, merged in the gcc 5 branch but not yet part of any gcc release. * - means not supported This commit only introduces the new options. Follow-up commits will progressively change the packages using BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to use the appropriate BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_x or BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC until the point where BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS can be removed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2016-02-02 16:31:20 +01:00
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_1
bool
default y
depends on !BR2_bfin
depends on !BR2_m68k_cf
toolchain: add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_{SYNC_x, ATOMIC} hidden booleans Currently, Buildroot provides one BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS boolean option to indicate whether the architecture supports atomic operations or not. However, the reality of atomic operations support is much more complicated and requires more than one option to be expressed properly. There are in fact two types of atomic built-ins provided by gcc: (1) The __sync_*() family of functions, which have been in gcc for a long time (probably gcc 4.1). They are available in variants operating on 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte integers. Some architectures implement a number of variants, some do not implement any, some implement all of them. They are now considered "legacy" by the gcc developers but are nonetheless still being used by a significant number of userspace libraries and applications. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html (2) The __atomic_*() family of functions, which have been introduced in gcc 4.7. They have been introduced in order to support C++11 atomic operations. In gcc 4.8, they are available on all architectures, either built-in or in the libatomic library part of the gcc runtime (in which case the application needs to be linked with -latomic). In gcc 4.7, the __atomic_*() intrinsics are only supported on certain architectures, since libatomic did not exist at the time. For (1), a single BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS is not sufficient, because depending on the architecture, some variants may or may not be available. Setting BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to false as soon as one of the variant is missing would cause a large number of packages to become unavailable, even if they in fact use only more common variants available on a large number of architectures. For this reason, we've chosen to introduce four new Config.in options: - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_1 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_2 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_3 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_4 Which indicate whether the toolchain support 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte __sync_*() built-ins respectively. For (2), we introduce a BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC, which indicates if the __atomic_*() built-ins are available. Note that it is up to the package to link with -latomic when gcc is >= 4.8. Since __atomic_*() intrinsics for all sizes are supported starting We conducted a fairly large analysis about various architectures supported by Buildroot, as well as with a number of different toolchains, to check which combinations support which variant. To do, we linked the following program with various toolchains: int main(void) { uint8_t a; uint16_t b; uint32_t c; uint64_t d; __sync_fetch_and_add(&a, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&b, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&c, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&d, 3); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&a, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&b, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&c, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&d, 1, 2); __atomic_add_fetch(&a, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&b, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&c, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&d, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&a, &a, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&b, &b, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&c, &c, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&d, &d, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); return 0; } And looked at which symbols were unresolved. For the __atomic_*() ones, we tested with and without -latomic to see which variants are built-in, which variants require libatomic. This testing effort has led to the following results: __sync __atomic gcc 1 2 4 8 1 2 4 8 ARC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.8 [with BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARC - - - - L L L L 4.8 [without BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARM Y Y Y X Y Y Y Y 4.8, 4.7 ARM Y Y Y - 4.5 AArch64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9, 5.1 Bfin - - Y - 4.3 i386 (i386) - - - - L L L L 4.9 i386 (i486..) Y Y Y - L L L L 4.9 [i486, c3, winchip2, winchip-c6] i386 (> i586) Y Y Y Y L L L L 4.9 Microblaze - - Y - L L Y L 4.9 MIPS Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 MIPS64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 NIOS 2 Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9, 5.2 PowerPC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SuperH Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SPARC - - - - L L L L 4.9 SPARC64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 x86_64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.7, 4.9 Xtensa Y Y Y - Y Y Y Y 4.9 Notes: * __atomic built-ins appeared in gcc 4.7, so for toolchais older than that, the __atomic column is empty. * Y means 'supported built-in' * L means 'supported via linking to libatomic' (only for __atomic functions) * X indicates a very special case for 8 bytes __sync built-ins on ARM. On ARMv7, there is no problem, starting from gcc 4.7, the __sync built-in for 8 bytes integers is implemented, fully in userspace. For cores < ARMv7, doing a 8 bytes atomic operation requires help from the kernel. Unfortunately, the libgcc code implementing this uses the __write() function to display an error, and this function is internal to glibc. Therefore, if you're using glibc everything is fine, but if you're using uClibc or musl, you cannot link an application that uses 8 bytes __sync operations. This has been fixed as part of gcc PR68095, merged in the gcc 5 branch but not yet part of any gcc release. * - means not supported This commit only introduces the new options. Follow-up commits will progressively change the packages using BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to use the appropriate BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_x or BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC until the point where BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS can be removed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2016-02-02 16:31:20 +01:00
depends on !BR2_microblaze
depends on !BR2_sparc
depends on !(BR2_arc && !BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT)
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_2
bool
default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_1
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_4
bool
default y
depends on !BR2_m68k_cf
toolchain: add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_{SYNC_x, ATOMIC} hidden booleans Currently, Buildroot provides one BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS boolean option to indicate whether the architecture supports atomic operations or not. However, the reality of atomic operations support is much more complicated and requires more than one option to be expressed properly. There are in fact two types of atomic built-ins provided by gcc: (1) The __sync_*() family of functions, which have been in gcc for a long time (probably gcc 4.1). They are available in variants operating on 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte integers. Some architectures implement a number of variants, some do not implement any, some implement all of them. They are now considered "legacy" by the gcc developers but are nonetheless still being used by a significant number of userspace libraries and applications. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html (2) The __atomic_*() family of functions, which have been introduced in gcc 4.7. They have been introduced in order to support C++11 atomic operations. In gcc 4.8, they are available on all architectures, either built-in or in the libatomic library part of the gcc runtime (in which case the application needs to be linked with -latomic). In gcc 4.7, the __atomic_*() intrinsics are only supported on certain architectures, since libatomic did not exist at the time. For (1), a single BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS is not sufficient, because depending on the architecture, some variants may or may not be available. Setting BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to false as soon as one of the variant is missing would cause a large number of packages to become unavailable, even if they in fact use only more common variants available on a large number of architectures. For this reason, we've chosen to introduce four new Config.in options: - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_1 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_2 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_3 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_4 Which indicate whether the toolchain support 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte __sync_*() built-ins respectively. For (2), we introduce a BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC, which indicates if the __atomic_*() built-ins are available. Note that it is up to the package to link with -latomic when gcc is >= 4.8. Since __atomic_*() intrinsics for all sizes are supported starting We conducted a fairly large analysis about various architectures supported by Buildroot, as well as with a number of different toolchains, to check which combinations support which variant. To do, we linked the following program with various toolchains: int main(void) { uint8_t a; uint16_t b; uint32_t c; uint64_t d; __sync_fetch_and_add(&a, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&b, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&c, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&d, 3); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&a, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&b, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&c, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&d, 1, 2); __atomic_add_fetch(&a, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&b, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&c, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&d, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&a, &a, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&b, &b, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&c, &c, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&d, &d, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); return 0; } And looked at which symbols were unresolved. For the __atomic_*() ones, we tested with and without -latomic to see which variants are built-in, which variants require libatomic. This testing effort has led to the following results: __sync __atomic gcc 1 2 4 8 1 2 4 8 ARC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.8 [with BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARC - - - - L L L L 4.8 [without BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARM Y Y Y X Y Y Y Y 4.8, 4.7 ARM Y Y Y - 4.5 AArch64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9, 5.1 Bfin - - Y - 4.3 i386 (i386) - - - - L L L L 4.9 i386 (i486..) Y Y Y - L L L L 4.9 [i486, c3, winchip2, winchip-c6] i386 (> i586) Y Y Y Y L L L L 4.9 Microblaze - - Y - L L Y L 4.9 MIPS Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 MIPS64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 NIOS 2 Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9, 5.2 PowerPC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SuperH Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SPARC - - - - L L L L 4.9 SPARC64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 x86_64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.7, 4.9 Xtensa Y Y Y - Y Y Y Y 4.9 Notes: * __atomic built-ins appeared in gcc 4.7, so for toolchais older than that, the __atomic column is empty. * Y means 'supported built-in' * L means 'supported via linking to libatomic' (only for __atomic functions) * X indicates a very special case for 8 bytes __sync built-ins on ARM. On ARMv7, there is no problem, starting from gcc 4.7, the __sync built-in for 8 bytes integers is implemented, fully in userspace. For cores < ARMv7, doing a 8 bytes atomic operation requires help from the kernel. Unfortunately, the libgcc code implementing this uses the __write() function to display an error, and this function is internal to glibc. Therefore, if you're using glibc everything is fine, but if you're using uClibc or musl, you cannot link an application that uses 8 bytes __sync operations. This has been fixed as part of gcc PR68095, merged in the gcc 5 branch but not yet part of any gcc release. * - means not supported This commit only introduces the new options. Follow-up commits will progressively change the packages using BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to use the appropriate BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_x or BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC until the point where BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS can be removed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2016-02-02 16:31:20 +01:00
depends on !BR2_sparc
depends on !(BR2_arc && !BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT)
# The availability of __sync for 8-byte types on ARM is somewhat
# complicated:
#
# - It appeared in gcc starting with gcc 4.7.
#
# - On ARMv7, there is no problem, it can be directly implemented in
# userspace.
#
# - On < ARMv7, it requires help from the kernel. Unfortunately, the
# libgcc code implementing 8-byte __sync with the help from the
# kernel calls __write() when a failure occurs, which is a function
# internal to glibc, not available in uClibc and musl. This means
# that the 8-byte __sync operations are not available on < ARMv7
# with uClibc and musl. This problem was fixed as part of gcc
# PR68059, which was backported to the gcc 5 branch, but isn't yet
# part of any gcc 5.x release.
#
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_ARM_HAS_SYNC_8
bool
default y
depends on BR2_arm || BR2_armeb
depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7
depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC || BR2_ARM_CPU_ARMV7A
# 8-byte intrinsics available on most x86 CPUs, except a few old ones
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_X86_HAS_SYNC_8
bool
default y
depends on BR2_i386
depends on !BR2_x86_i486
depends on !BR2_x86_c3
depends on !BR2_x86_winchip_c6
depends on !BR2_x86_winchip2
# 8-byte intrinsics available:
# - On all 64 bits architecture
# - On a certain combinations of ARM platforms
# - On certain x86 32 bits CPUs
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_8
bool
default y if BR2_ARCH_IS_64
default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_ARM_HAS_SYNC_8
default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_X86_HAS_SYNC_8
# libatomic is available since gcc 4.8, when thread support is
# enabled. Also, libatomic doesn't recognize "uclinux" as a valid OS
# part of the tuple, and is therefore not build on uclinux targets,
# which is why BR2_BINFMT_FLAT configurations are excluded.
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_LIBATOMIC
bool
default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8 && \
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS && \
!BR2_BINFMT_FLAT
toolchain: add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_{SYNC_x, ATOMIC} hidden booleans Currently, Buildroot provides one BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS boolean option to indicate whether the architecture supports atomic operations or not. However, the reality of atomic operations support is much more complicated and requires more than one option to be expressed properly. There are in fact two types of atomic built-ins provided by gcc: (1) The __sync_*() family of functions, which have been in gcc for a long time (probably gcc 4.1). They are available in variants operating on 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte integers. Some architectures implement a number of variants, some do not implement any, some implement all of them. They are now considered "legacy" by the gcc developers but are nonetheless still being used by a significant number of userspace libraries and applications. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html (2) The __atomic_*() family of functions, which have been introduced in gcc 4.7. They have been introduced in order to support C++11 atomic operations. In gcc 4.8, they are available on all architectures, either built-in or in the libatomic library part of the gcc runtime (in which case the application needs to be linked with -latomic). In gcc 4.7, the __atomic_*() intrinsics are only supported on certain architectures, since libatomic did not exist at the time. For (1), a single BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS is not sufficient, because depending on the architecture, some variants may or may not be available. Setting BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to false as soon as one of the variant is missing would cause a large number of packages to become unavailable, even if they in fact use only more common variants available on a large number of architectures. For this reason, we've chosen to introduce four new Config.in options: - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_1 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_2 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_3 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_4 Which indicate whether the toolchain support 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte __sync_*() built-ins respectively. For (2), we introduce a BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC, which indicates if the __atomic_*() built-ins are available. Note that it is up to the package to link with -latomic when gcc is >= 4.8. Since __atomic_*() intrinsics for all sizes are supported starting We conducted a fairly large analysis about various architectures supported by Buildroot, as well as with a number of different toolchains, to check which combinations support which variant. To do, we linked the following program with various toolchains: int main(void) { uint8_t a; uint16_t b; uint32_t c; uint64_t d; __sync_fetch_and_add(&a, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&b, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&c, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&d, 3); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&a, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&b, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&c, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&d, 1, 2); __atomic_add_fetch(&a, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&b, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&c, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&d, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&a, &a, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&b, &b, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&c, &c, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&d, &d, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); return 0; } And looked at which symbols were unresolved. For the __atomic_*() ones, we tested with and without -latomic to see which variants are built-in, which variants require libatomic. This testing effort has led to the following results: __sync __atomic gcc 1 2 4 8 1 2 4 8 ARC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.8 [with BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARC - - - - L L L L 4.8 [without BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARM Y Y Y X Y Y Y Y 4.8, 4.7 ARM Y Y Y - 4.5 AArch64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9, 5.1 Bfin - - Y - 4.3 i386 (i386) - - - - L L L L 4.9 i386 (i486..) Y Y Y - L L L L 4.9 [i486, c3, winchip2, winchip-c6] i386 (> i586) Y Y Y Y L L L L 4.9 Microblaze - - Y - L L Y L 4.9 MIPS Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 MIPS64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 NIOS 2 Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9, 5.2 PowerPC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SuperH Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SPARC - - - - L L L L 4.9 SPARC64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 x86_64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.7, 4.9 Xtensa Y Y Y - Y Y Y Y 4.9 Notes: * __atomic built-ins appeared in gcc 4.7, so for toolchais older than that, the __atomic column is empty. * Y means 'supported built-in' * L means 'supported via linking to libatomic' (only for __atomic functions) * X indicates a very special case for 8 bytes __sync built-ins on ARM. On ARMv7, there is no problem, starting from gcc 4.7, the __sync built-in for 8 bytes integers is implemented, fully in userspace. For cores < ARMv7, doing a 8 bytes atomic operation requires help from the kernel. Unfortunately, the libgcc code implementing this uses the __write() function to display an error, and this function is internal to glibc. Therefore, if you're using glibc everything is fine, but if you're using uClibc or musl, you cannot link an application that uses 8 bytes __sync operations. This has been fixed as part of gcc PR68095, merged in the gcc 5 branch but not yet part of any gcc release. * - means not supported This commit only introduces the new options. Follow-up commits will progressively change the packages using BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to use the appropriate BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_x or BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC until the point where BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS can be removed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2016-02-02 16:31:20 +01:00
# __atomic intrinsics are available:
# - with gcc 4.8, either through built-ins or libatomic, on all
# architectures. Since we don't want to separate the cases where
# libatomic is needed vs. not needed, we simplify thing and only
# support situations where libatomic is available, even if on some
# architectures libatomic is not strictly needed as all __atomic
# intrinsics might be built-in. The only case where libatomic is
# missing entirely is when the toolchain does not have support for
# threads. However, a package that does not need threads but still
# uses atomics is quite a corner case, which does not warrant the
# added complexity.
toolchain: add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_{SYNC_x, ATOMIC} hidden booleans Currently, Buildroot provides one BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS boolean option to indicate whether the architecture supports atomic operations or not. However, the reality of atomic operations support is much more complicated and requires more than one option to be expressed properly. There are in fact two types of atomic built-ins provided by gcc: (1) The __sync_*() family of functions, which have been in gcc for a long time (probably gcc 4.1). They are available in variants operating on 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte integers. Some architectures implement a number of variants, some do not implement any, some implement all of them. They are now considered "legacy" by the gcc developers but are nonetheless still being used by a significant number of userspace libraries and applications. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html (2) The __atomic_*() family of functions, which have been introduced in gcc 4.7. They have been introduced in order to support C++11 atomic operations. In gcc 4.8, they are available on all architectures, either built-in or in the libatomic library part of the gcc runtime (in which case the application needs to be linked with -latomic). In gcc 4.7, the __atomic_*() intrinsics are only supported on certain architectures, since libatomic did not exist at the time. For (1), a single BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS is not sufficient, because depending on the architecture, some variants may or may not be available. Setting BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to false as soon as one of the variant is missing would cause a large number of packages to become unavailable, even if they in fact use only more common variants available on a large number of architectures. For this reason, we've chosen to introduce four new Config.in options: - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_1 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_2 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_3 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_4 Which indicate whether the toolchain support 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte __sync_*() built-ins respectively. For (2), we introduce a BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC, which indicates if the __atomic_*() built-ins are available. Note that it is up to the package to link with -latomic when gcc is >= 4.8. Since __atomic_*() intrinsics for all sizes are supported starting We conducted a fairly large analysis about various architectures supported by Buildroot, as well as with a number of different toolchains, to check which combinations support which variant. To do, we linked the following program with various toolchains: int main(void) { uint8_t a; uint16_t b; uint32_t c; uint64_t d; __sync_fetch_and_add(&a, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&b, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&c, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&d, 3); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&a, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&b, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&c, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&d, 1, 2); __atomic_add_fetch(&a, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&b, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&c, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&d, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&a, &a, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&b, &b, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&c, &c, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&d, &d, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); return 0; } And looked at which symbols were unresolved. For the __atomic_*() ones, we tested with and without -latomic to see which variants are built-in, which variants require libatomic. This testing effort has led to the following results: __sync __atomic gcc 1 2 4 8 1 2 4 8 ARC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.8 [with BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARC - - - - L L L L 4.8 [without BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARM Y Y Y X Y Y Y Y 4.8, 4.7 ARM Y Y Y - 4.5 AArch64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9, 5.1 Bfin - - Y - 4.3 i386 (i386) - - - - L L L L 4.9 i386 (i486..) Y Y Y - L L L L 4.9 [i486, c3, winchip2, winchip-c6] i386 (> i586) Y Y Y Y L L L L 4.9 Microblaze - - Y - L L Y L 4.9 MIPS Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 MIPS64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 NIOS 2 Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9, 5.2 PowerPC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SuperH Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SPARC - - - - L L L L 4.9 SPARC64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 x86_64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.7, 4.9 Xtensa Y Y Y - Y Y Y Y 4.9 Notes: * __atomic built-ins appeared in gcc 4.7, so for toolchais older than that, the __atomic column is empty. * Y means 'supported built-in' * L means 'supported via linking to libatomic' (only for __atomic functions) * X indicates a very special case for 8 bytes __sync built-ins on ARM. On ARMv7, there is no problem, starting from gcc 4.7, the __sync built-in for 8 bytes integers is implemented, fully in userspace. For cores < ARMv7, doing a 8 bytes atomic operation requires help from the kernel. Unfortunately, the libgcc code implementing this uses the __write() function to display an error, and this function is internal to glibc. Therefore, if you're using glibc everything is fine, but if you're using uClibc or musl, you cannot link an application that uses 8 bytes __sync operations. This has been fixed as part of gcc PR68095, merged in the gcc 5 branch but not yet part of any gcc release. * - means not supported This commit only introduces the new options. Follow-up commits will progressively change the packages using BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to use the appropriate BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_x or BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC until the point where BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS can be removed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2016-02-02 16:31:20 +01:00
# - with gcc 4.7, libatomic did not exist, so only built-ins are
# available. This means that __atomic can only be used in a subset
# of the architectures
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC
bool
default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_LIBATOMIC
toolchain: add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_{SYNC_x, ATOMIC} hidden booleans Currently, Buildroot provides one BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS boolean option to indicate whether the architecture supports atomic operations or not. However, the reality of atomic operations support is much more complicated and requires more than one option to be expressed properly. There are in fact two types of atomic built-ins provided by gcc: (1) The __sync_*() family of functions, which have been in gcc for a long time (probably gcc 4.1). They are available in variants operating on 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte integers. Some architectures implement a number of variants, some do not implement any, some implement all of them. They are now considered "legacy" by the gcc developers but are nonetheless still being used by a significant number of userspace libraries and applications. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html (2) The __atomic_*() family of functions, which have been introduced in gcc 4.7. They have been introduced in order to support C++11 atomic operations. In gcc 4.8, they are available on all architectures, either built-in or in the libatomic library part of the gcc runtime (in which case the application needs to be linked with -latomic). In gcc 4.7, the __atomic_*() intrinsics are only supported on certain architectures, since libatomic did not exist at the time. For (1), a single BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS is not sufficient, because depending on the architecture, some variants may or may not be available. Setting BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to false as soon as one of the variant is missing would cause a large number of packages to become unavailable, even if they in fact use only more common variants available on a large number of architectures. For this reason, we've chosen to introduce four new Config.in options: - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_1 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_2 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_3 - BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_4 Which indicate whether the toolchain support 1-byte, 2-byte, 4-byte and 8-byte __sync_*() built-ins respectively. For (2), we introduce a BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC, which indicates if the __atomic_*() built-ins are available. Note that it is up to the package to link with -latomic when gcc is >= 4.8. Since __atomic_*() intrinsics for all sizes are supported starting We conducted a fairly large analysis about various architectures supported by Buildroot, as well as with a number of different toolchains, to check which combinations support which variant. To do, we linked the following program with various toolchains: int main(void) { uint8_t a; uint16_t b; uint32_t c; uint64_t d; __sync_fetch_and_add(&a, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&b, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&c, 3); __sync_fetch_and_add(&d, 3); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&a, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&b, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&c, 1, 2); __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&d, 1, 2); __atomic_add_fetch(&a, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&b, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&c, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_add_fetch(&d, 3, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&a, &a, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&b, &b, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&c, &c, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&d, &d, 2, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); return 0; } And looked at which symbols were unresolved. For the __atomic_*() ones, we tested with and without -latomic to see which variants are built-in, which variants require libatomic. This testing effort has led to the following results: __sync __atomic gcc 1 2 4 8 1 2 4 8 ARC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.8 [with BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARC - - - - L L L L 4.8 [without BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT] ARM Y Y Y X Y Y Y Y 4.8, 4.7 ARM Y Y Y - 4.5 AArch64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9, 5.1 Bfin - - Y - 4.3 i386 (i386) - - - - L L L L 4.9 i386 (i486..) Y Y Y - L L L L 4.9 [i486, c3, winchip2, winchip-c6] i386 (> i586) Y Y Y Y L L L L 4.9 Microblaze - - Y - L L Y L 4.9 MIPS Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 MIPS64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 NIOS 2 Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9, 5.2 PowerPC Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SuperH Y Y Y - Y Y Y L 4.9 SPARC - - - - L L L L 4.9 SPARC64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.9 x86_64 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 4.7, 4.9 Xtensa Y Y Y - Y Y Y Y 4.9 Notes: * __atomic built-ins appeared in gcc 4.7, so for toolchais older than that, the __atomic column is empty. * Y means 'supported built-in' * L means 'supported via linking to libatomic' (only for __atomic functions) * X indicates a very special case for 8 bytes __sync built-ins on ARM. On ARMv7, there is no problem, starting from gcc 4.7, the __sync built-in for 8 bytes integers is implemented, fully in userspace. For cores < ARMv7, doing a 8 bytes atomic operation requires help from the kernel. Unfortunately, the libgcc code implementing this uses the __write() function to display an error, and this function is internal to glibc. Therefore, if you're using glibc everything is fine, but if you're using uClibc or musl, you cannot link an application that uses 8 bytes __sync operations. This has been fixed as part of gcc PR68095, merged in the gcc 5 branch but not yet part of any gcc release. * - means not supported This commit only introduces the new options. Follow-up commits will progressively change the packages using BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS to use the appropriate BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_SYNC_x or BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC until the point where BR2_ARCH_HAS_ATOMICS can be removed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2016-02-02 16:31:20 +01:00
default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7 && BR2_arm
default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7 && BR2_armeb
default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7 && BR2_xtensa
default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7 && BR2_ARCH_IS_64
# - libquadmath is not needed/available on all architectures (but gcc
# correctly handles this already).
# - At least, libquadmath is available on:
# - i*86
# - x86_64
# - When available, libquadmath requires wchar support.
config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_LIBQUADMATH
bool
default y if BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64