core: check files are not touched by more than one package
Currently, we do nothing about packages that touch the same file: given
a specific configuration, the result is reproducible (even though it
might not be what the user expected) because the build order is
guaranteed.
However, when we later introduce top-level parallel build, we will no
longer be able to guarantee a build order, by the mere way of it being
parallel. Reconciliating all those modified files will be impossible to
do automatically. The only way will be to refuse such situations.
As a preliminary step, introduce a helper script that detects files that
are being moified by two or more packages, and reports them and the
impacted packages, at the end of the build.
The list being reported at the end of the build will make it prominently
visible in autobuilder results, so we can assess the problem, if any.
Later on, calling that helper script can be done right after the package
installation step, to bail out early.
Thanks Arnout for the pythonist way to write default dictionaries! ;-)
Note: doing it in python rather than a shell script is impressively
faster: where the shell script takes ~1.2s on a minimalist build, the
python script only takes ~0.015s, that is about 80 times faster.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
[Thomas: rename script without .py extension.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2017-10-28 17:30:59 +02:00
|
|
|
#!/usr/bin/env python
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import sys
|
|
|
|
import argparse
|
|
|
|
from collections import defaultdict
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-03 15:36:19 +01:00
|
|
|
warn = 'Warning: {0} file "{1}" is touched by more than one package: {2}\n'
|
core: check files are not touched by more than one package
Currently, we do nothing about packages that touch the same file: given
a specific configuration, the result is reproducible (even though it
might not be what the user expected) because the build order is
guaranteed.
However, when we later introduce top-level parallel build, we will no
longer be able to guarantee a build order, by the mere way of it being
parallel. Reconciliating all those modified files will be impossible to
do automatically. The only way will be to refuse such situations.
As a preliminary step, introduce a helper script that detects files that
are being moified by two or more packages, and reports them and the
impacted packages, at the end of the build.
The list being reported at the end of the build will make it prominently
visible in autobuilder results, so we can assess the problem, if any.
Later on, calling that helper script can be done right after the package
installation step, to bail out early.
Thanks Arnout for the pythonist way to write default dictionaries! ;-)
Note: doing it in python rather than a shell script is impressively
faster: where the shell script takes ~1.2s on a minimalist build, the
python script only takes ~0.015s, that is about 80 times faster.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
[Thomas: rename script without .py extension.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2017-10-28 17:30:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-22 01:44:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
core: check files are not touched by more than one package
Currently, we do nothing about packages that touch the same file: given
a specific configuration, the result is reproducible (even though it
might not be what the user expected) because the build order is
guaranteed.
However, when we later introduce top-level parallel build, we will no
longer be able to guarantee a build order, by the mere way of it being
parallel. Reconciliating all those modified files will be impossible to
do automatically. The only way will be to refuse such situations.
As a preliminary step, introduce a helper script that detects files that
are being moified by two or more packages, and reports them and the
impacted packages, at the end of the build.
The list being reported at the end of the build will make it prominently
visible in autobuilder results, so we can assess the problem, if any.
Later on, calling that helper script can be done right after the package
installation step, to bail out early.
Thanks Arnout for the pythonist way to write default dictionaries! ;-)
Note: doing it in python rather than a shell script is impressively
faster: where the shell script takes ~1.2s on a minimalist build, the
python script only takes ~0.015s, that is about 80 times faster.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
[Thomas: rename script without .py extension.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2017-10-28 17:30:59 +02:00
|
|
|
def main():
|
|
|
|
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
|
|
|
|
parser.add_argument('packages_file_list', nargs='*',
|
2018-01-22 01:44:30 +01:00
|
|
|
help='The packages-file-list to check from')
|
core: check files are not touched by more than one package
Currently, we do nothing about packages that touch the same file: given
a specific configuration, the result is reproducible (even though it
might not be what the user expected) because the build order is
guaranteed.
However, when we later introduce top-level parallel build, we will no
longer be able to guarantee a build order, by the mere way of it being
parallel. Reconciliating all those modified files will be impossible to
do automatically. The only way will be to refuse such situations.
As a preliminary step, introduce a helper script that detects files that
are being moified by two or more packages, and reports them and the
impacted packages, at the end of the build.
The list being reported at the end of the build will make it prominently
visible in autobuilder results, so we can assess the problem, if any.
Later on, calling that helper script can be done right after the package
installation step, to bail out early.
Thanks Arnout for the pythonist way to write default dictionaries! ;-)
Note: doing it in python rather than a shell script is impressively
faster: where the shell script takes ~1.2s on a minimalist build, the
python script only takes ~0.015s, that is about 80 times faster.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
[Thomas: rename script without .py extension.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2017-10-28 17:30:59 +02:00
|
|
|
parser.add_argument('-t', '--type', metavar="TYPE",
|
|
|
|
help='Report as a TYPE file (TYPE is either target, staging, or host)')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
args = parser.parse_args()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if not len(args.packages_file_list) == 1:
|
|
|
|
sys.stderr.write('No packages-file-list was provided.\n')
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if args.type is None:
|
|
|
|
sys.stderr.write('No type was provided\n')
|
|
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
file_to_pkg = defaultdict(list)
|
support/check-uniq-files: support weird locales and filenames
Currently, when a filename contains characters not representable in the
user's locale, we fail hard, especially when the host python is python3.
This is because python2 and python3 handle encoding/decoding strings
differently, with python3 presumable doing the right thing, but it
breaks on some systems, while python2 presumable does the wrong thing,
but it works everywhere. (Just joking, obviously...)
Part of the issue being that the csv reader in python2 is broken with
UTF8.
We fix the issue by ditching the csv reader, and simply read the file in
binary mode, manually partitioning the lines on the first comma.
Then, we use the binary-encoded (really, un-encoded) package names and
filenames as values and keys, respectively.
Finally, for each filename or package we need to print, we try to decode
them with the defaults for the user settings, but catch any decoding
exception and fall back to dumping the raw, binary values. Which codec
is used by default differs between Python version, but in all cases
something sane is printed at least.
Thanks a lot to Arnout for the live help doing this patch. :-)
Reported-by: Jaap Crezee <jaap@jcz.nl>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Jaap Crezee <jaap@jcz.nl>
[Arnout: commit log improvement]
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
2018-03-31 14:52:50 +02:00
|
|
|
with open(args.packages_file_list[0], 'rb') as pkg_file_list:
|
|
|
|
for line in pkg_file_list.readlines():
|
|
|
|
pkg, _, file = line.rstrip(b'\n').partition(b',')
|
core: check files are not touched by more than one package
Currently, we do nothing about packages that touch the same file: given
a specific configuration, the result is reproducible (even though it
might not be what the user expected) because the build order is
guaranteed.
However, when we later introduce top-level parallel build, we will no
longer be able to guarantee a build order, by the mere way of it being
parallel. Reconciliating all those modified files will be impossible to
do automatically. The only way will be to refuse such situations.
As a preliminary step, introduce a helper script that detects files that
are being moified by two or more packages, and reports them and the
impacted packages, at the end of the build.
The list being reported at the end of the build will make it prominently
visible in autobuilder results, so we can assess the problem, if any.
Later on, calling that helper script can be done right after the package
installation step, to bail out early.
Thanks Arnout for the pythonist way to write default dictionaries! ;-)
Note: doing it in python rather than a shell script is impressively
faster: where the shell script takes ~1.2s on a minimalist build, the
python script only takes ~0.015s, that is about 80 times faster.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
[Thomas: rename script without .py extension.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2017-10-28 17:30:59 +02:00
|
|
|
file_to_pkg[file].append(pkg)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for file in file_to_pkg:
|
|
|
|
if len(file_to_pkg[file]) > 1:
|
support/check-uniq-files: support weird locales and filenames
Currently, when a filename contains characters not representable in the
user's locale, we fail hard, especially when the host python is python3.
This is because python2 and python3 handle encoding/decoding strings
differently, with python3 presumable doing the right thing, but it
breaks on some systems, while python2 presumable does the wrong thing,
but it works everywhere. (Just joking, obviously...)
Part of the issue being that the csv reader in python2 is broken with
UTF8.
We fix the issue by ditching the csv reader, and simply read the file in
binary mode, manually partitioning the lines on the first comma.
Then, we use the binary-encoded (really, un-encoded) package names and
filenames as values and keys, respectively.
Finally, for each filename or package we need to print, we try to decode
them with the defaults for the user settings, but catch any decoding
exception and fall back to dumping the raw, binary values. Which codec
is used by default differs between Python version, but in all cases
something sane is printed at least.
Thanks a lot to Arnout for the live help doing this patch. :-)
Reported-by: Jaap Crezee <jaap@jcz.nl>
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Jaap Crezee <jaap@jcz.nl>
[Arnout: commit log improvement]
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
2018-03-31 14:52:50 +02:00
|
|
|
# If possible, try to decode the binary strings with
|
|
|
|
# the default user's locale
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
sys.stderr.write(warn.format(args.type, file.decode(),
|
|
|
|
[p.decode() for p in file_to_pkg[file]]))
|
|
|
|
except UnicodeDecodeError:
|
|
|
|
# ... but fallback to just dumping them raw if they
|
|
|
|
# contain non-representable chars
|
|
|
|
sys.stderr.write(warn.format(args.type, file,
|
|
|
|
file_to_pkg[file]))
|
core: check files are not touched by more than one package
Currently, we do nothing about packages that touch the same file: given
a specific configuration, the result is reproducible (even though it
might not be what the user expected) because the build order is
guaranteed.
However, when we later introduce top-level parallel build, we will no
longer be able to guarantee a build order, by the mere way of it being
parallel. Reconciliating all those modified files will be impossible to
do automatically. The only way will be to refuse such situations.
As a preliminary step, introduce a helper script that detects files that
are being moified by two or more packages, and reports them and the
impacted packages, at the end of the build.
The list being reported at the end of the build will make it prominently
visible in autobuilder results, so we can assess the problem, if any.
Later on, calling that helper script can be done right after the package
installation step, to bail out early.
Thanks Arnout for the pythonist way to write default dictionaries! ;-)
Note: doing it in python rather than a shell script is impressively
faster: where the shell script takes ~1.2s on a minimalist build, the
python script only takes ~0.015s, that is about 80 times faster.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
[Thomas: rename script without .py extension.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2017-10-28 17:30:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-22 01:44:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
core: check files are not touched by more than one package
Currently, we do nothing about packages that touch the same file: given
a specific configuration, the result is reproducible (even though it
might not be what the user expected) because the build order is
guaranteed.
However, when we later introduce top-level parallel build, we will no
longer be able to guarantee a build order, by the mere way of it being
parallel. Reconciliating all those modified files will be impossible to
do automatically. The only way will be to refuse such situations.
As a preliminary step, introduce a helper script that detects files that
are being moified by two or more packages, and reports them and the
impacted packages, at the end of the build.
The list being reported at the end of the build will make it prominently
visible in autobuilder results, so we can assess the problem, if any.
Later on, calling that helper script can be done right after the package
installation step, to bail out early.
Thanks Arnout for the pythonist way to write default dictionaries! ;-)
Note: doing it in python rather than a shell script is impressively
faster: where the shell script takes ~1.2s on a minimalist build, the
python script only takes ~0.015s, that is about 80 times faster.
Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
[Thomas: rename script without .py extension.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2017-10-28 17:30:59 +02:00
|
|
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
|
|
sys.exit(main())
|